This article examines the global rise of “pseudolaw”—an umbrella term encompassing “sovereign citizens,” “Freemen on the Land,” “Reichsbürger,” and related movements that reject state authority while performing their own versions of law. Building on examples from Germany, New Zealand, Australia, and North America, it argues that pseudolaw cannot be understood merely as pathology or delusion. Instead, it should be seen as a form of prefigurative legality: a performative practice through which adherents enact alternative legal orders “as if” their desired sovereignty already exists. By drafting documents, issuing liens, or conducting courtroom rituals, participants embody legality without institutional sanction, challenging the state’s monopoly over lawful meaning and subjection. There are, however, differences between pseudolaw and other forms of prefigurative practice. Accordingly, evaluating pseudolaw as prefigurative legality extends our understanding of legal prefiguration.
Young et al. (Sat,) studied this question.