PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A socio-economic, environmental and economic impact evaluation of selected EPWP programmes within the environmental programmes branch for the period 2012-2016: main evaluation report

View Full Paper
HCHuman Sciences Research Council

Key Points

  • This evaluation aims to assess the socio-economic and environmental impacts of selected EPWP programmes implemented from 2012 to 2016.
  • Evaluation of sub-programmes from Natural Resource Management and Environmental Protection Infrastructure Programme
  • Focus on socio-economic outcomes related to unemployment and poverty alleviation
  • Analysis of alignment with National Development Plan Vision 2030
  • Significant improvements in community engagement and employment rates through EPWP initiatives
  • Enhanced local environmental management practices observed
  • Contributions to poverty reduction and increased social protection noted in targeted areas

Abstract

Public employment programmes (PEPs) have been widely implemented as a key policy instrument for addressing seasonal, short-term unemployment and for disaster mitigation for vulnerable populations. In the face of high levels of poverty, unprecedented levels of unemployment and inequality the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP) in South Africa was established in 2004. EPWP is of strategic importance and is aligned to the National Development Plan Vision 2030 (NPC, 2012) and is positioned as a key programme to contribute to achieving government���s goals of halving unemployment, building communities and active citizenship and reducing gaps in the social protection system of the country. The evaluation focused on sub-programmes implemented through the two Chief Directorates within DEA, namely the Natural Resource Management (NRM) and the Environmental Protection Infrastructure Programme (EPIP) Chief Directorates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e83b0e02ee3982d32e70https://doi.org/10.14749/32378958
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper