PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026EJC Paediatric Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Challenges in delineation for Ewing Sarcoma of the chest wall and pelvis: results of a QUARTET – Euro-Ewing Consortium joint workshop

MGMaria Chiara Lo GrecoVHV. HertsykMCMelissa Christiaens

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify and address ambiguities in radiotherapy contouring for Ewing Sarcoma at specific anatomical sites.
  • Conducted delineation workshops from September 2023 to March 2025
  • Analyzed two treated cases: pelvic and chest wall Ewing Sarcoma
  • Performed visual and quantitative analyses of delineation outcomes.
  • Substantial variability in target volumes observed among clinicians
  • Agreed on considering anatomical barriers and applying a 0.5-cm margin where applicable
  • Consensus reached on including non-infiltrated surfaces in GTV for chest wall cases.

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction Despite existing radiotherapy contouring guidelines for Ewing's sarcoma (ES), important gaps remain for certain anatomical sites. The Euro-Ewing Consortium radiotherapy committee collaborated with QUARTET to identify and address ambiguities through consensus statements. Material and methods Between September 2023 and March 2025, a series of delineation workshops were held using two previously treated cases: a pelvic ES treated with radical radiotherapy and a chest wall ES treated post-operatively. The requested structures included GTVpPre, GTVpPost, CTVpPre₄500 and CTVpPost₅400 for both cases; as well as CTVpPost₆000 for pelvic case and CTVpLung₁500 for chest wall case. Visual and quantitative analyses were performed. Results For the pelvic case, substantial variability was observed in the CTVpPre₄500, CTVpPost₅400, and CTVpPost₆000 volumes. As differences were primarily related to adjustments at anatomical barriers, participants agreed to consider compartmental fascia as natural barriers in the absence of infiltration, and to apply a 0. 5-cm margin beyond the barrier when the ES was in direct contact. For the chest wall case, variability in GTVpPre and GTVpPost were related to changes between pre- and post-operative anatomy and reflected in CTVpPre₄500 and CTVpPost₅400 delineation. It was therefore agreed that non-infiltrated surfaces in contact with the tumour before surgery should be included in the GTVpPre. Standard margins should be applied to generate CTVpPre₄500, which should then be edited to avoid the skin, lungs, and heart while ensuring inclusion of the surgical bed. Conclusions The delineation workshops highlighted significant inter-clinician variability in target definition for ES. The resulting consensus statements will be used to supplement existing resources and support clinicians.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Greco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8520e02ee3982d330afhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper