PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Building Acoustics0 citations

Lightweight membrane-type acoustic meta-panel with flexible/hierarchical cells for the low-frequency sound insulation

View Full Paper
AKAlireza Soleimani KhoshruDYDavood Younesian

Key Points

  • This work aims to develop lightweight membrane-type acoustic metamaterials with enhanced low-frequency sound insulation. The study explores the influence of geometric variations on sound transmission loss.
  • Conducted numerical and experimental analyses on five microphone models with identical mass and varying geometries.
  • Analyzed sound transmission loss and modal characteristics using finite element method (FEM).
  • Validated simulation results through reverberant-anechoic testing of 3D-printed prototypes.
  • Model II showed high sound transmission loss performance in the range of 140–350 Hz, while Model I excelled from 350–1500 Hz.
  • Model V demonstrated superior performance in Class 2 in the ranges of 100–200 Hz and 350–700 Hz.
  • MAM samples enhanced sound transmission loss by 14–22 dBA compared to conventional materials like rockwool and polyethylene.

Abstract

In this study, lightweight membrane-type acoustic metamaterial with flexible and hierarchical structures are proposed to enhance the low-frequency sound insulation performance. Numerical and experimental analyses are conducted on the five models with identical mass in two classes with varying geometries. The sound transmission loss and modal characteristics of the membrane-type acoustic metamaterials are analyzed using the FEM. This analysis provides insight into their acoustic and dynamic behavior in the low-frequency range. The finite element simulation results are validated through reverberant-anechoic testing using a 3D-printed prototypes of the model I and Model II. Modal analysis demonstrated the influences of different geometries on the sound insulation performance. The models with complex geometry (including: Model I, Model II, and Model V) resulted in higher eigenfrequencies in high-order modes, which was caused by their rigidity. In contrast, uniformly spaced eigenfrequencies were observed in some other models including Model III, which exhibited more fluctuations in sound transmission loss across the low-frequency range. Peaks in sound transmission loss mainly occurred around the eigenfrequencies. The first resonance region corresponds to the first eigenmode, resulting in a sharp drop in the sound transmission loss curve. Furthermore, the first peak and the majority of high sound transmission loss values occurred in the anti-resonance regions. Model II presented high sound transmission loss performance in the range of 140–350 Hz, whereas Model I achieved better performance in the range of 350–1500 Hz. Superior performance in Class 2 was achieved by Model V in the ranges of 100–200 Hz and 350–700 Hz. Overall, MAM samples showed an enhancement of 14–22 dBA in sound transmission loss compared to conventional materials, such as rockwool and polyethylene acoustic foam. Statistical calculations show a relatively small difference between the numerical simulation and experimental test. This work demonstrates that lightweight membrane-type acoustic metamaterials can achieve high sound transmission loss in low-frequency ranges without any need to increase the wall mass, through optimized geometrical design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khoshru et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8d20e02ee3982d33662https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010x251412548
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper