PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026BioResources0 citationsOpen Access

Identifying Genuine vs. Artificial Wood Grain Using PCA and SVM

Identification of genuine and artificial wood grain based on PCA-SVM

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YWYì WángLPLiangze PanZWZhen Wang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial identifies genuine and artificial wood grains, indicating potential for quality control.

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a method that can accurately differentiate genuine wood grains from artificial ones.
  • Utilized nine-dimensional gloss data and two surface roughness parameters.
  • Applied PCA on training data to extract principal components.
  • Trained an SVM classifier using the components and evaluated performance on test data.
  • Achieved an accuracy of 96.76%, F1-score of 0.9761, and MCC of 0.9285.
  • Outperformed other models including standalone SVM, Logistic Regression, and PLS.
  • Demonstrated robustness and efficiency in distinguishing wood grain types.

Cite This Study

Wáng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153790b5d9c58d83e8bf0bhttps://doi.org/10.15376/biores.21.3.6253-6266
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share