PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Journal of the American Heart Association0 citationsOpen Access

Proper Use of the National Inpatient Sample Database to Analyze Safety of Cardiovascular Procedures

View Full Paper
KOKathleen OakesJPJenna PortAFAriel Furer

Key Result

Atrial fibrillation ablation on day 1 of admission or before was associated with a higher rate of procedural complications compared to day 2 or later (9.5% vs 6.6%; OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30-1.83).

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using the National Inpatient Sample database, addressing potential biases.
  • Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of hospitalized patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation from 2016 to 2022.
  • Patients were divided into two groups based on hospitalization day: day 1 of admission or earlier, and day 2 of admission or later.
  • Comparison of patient characteristics and complication rates between the two groups.
  • The analysis included 47,925 weighted hospitalizations for catheter ablation.
  • Group 1 had a higher complication rate of 9.5% compared to 6.6% in Group 2 (P < 0.001).
  • Group 1 was identified as an independent predictor of complications with an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% CI, 1.30–1.83; P < 0.001).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=47,925)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the timing of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (day 1 vs day 2 or later of admission) affect the recorded procedural complication rates in the National Inpatient Sample database?

P
Population
47,925 weighted hospitalizations of patients in the National Inpatient Sample data set who underwent atrial fibrillation catheter ablation between 2016 and 2022.
I
Intervention
Ablation performed on day 1 of admission or before (group 1)
C
Comparator
Ablation performed on day 2 of admission or later (group 2)
O
Outcome
Procedural complication ratessafety

Using the National Inpatient Sample to analyze safety of primarily outpatient procedures like AF ablation is subject to significant selection bias, falsely inflating complication rates.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.30-1.83)

Absolute Event Rate: 9.5% vs 6.6%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Selection bias falsely inflating the complication rate of patients in the National Inpatient Sample data set due to selective hospitalization of outpatient complications.

Abstract

Background Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database for the safety of procedures that are primarily outpatient in nature can be biased due to the selective hospitalization of patients who have complications during these procedures. Methods This is a retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of hospitalized patients in the National Inpatient Sample data set who underwent an atrial fibrillation catheter ablation between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the day of hospitalization on which the ablation was performed: day 1 of admission or before (group 1), versus day 2 of admission or later (group 2). Patient baseline characteristics and procedural complication rates were compared. Results The analysis included 47 925 weighted hospitalizations of patients who underwent atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Group 1 had significantly fewer octagenerians (6.9% versus 10.4%), lower rates of renal disease (12.6% versus 20.0%), heart failure (28.3% versus 45.8%), and ischemic heart disease (16.0% versus 20.5%), P <0.001 for all, compared with group 2. The rate of complication was higher in group 1 (9.5% versus 6.6%; P <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed study group 1 to be an independent predictor of complications (odds ratio, 1.54 95% CI, 1.30–1.83; P <0.001). Conclusions Patients undergoing procedures on the day of admission or before were younger and had fewer comorbidities. Despite this, these patients had a significantly higher rate of procedural complications. The likely explanation for these results is selection bias, where patients undergoing outpatient procedures who are at higher risk or develop complications are admitted as inpatients, thus falsely inflating the complication rate of patients in the National Inpatient Sample data set.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oakes et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=47,925). Ablation on day 1 of admission or before vs. Ablation on day 2 of admission or later was evaluated on Procedural complications (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30-1.83, p=<0.001). Atrial fibrillation ablation on day 1 of admission or before was associated with a higher rate of procedural complications compared to day 2 or later (9.5% vs 6.6%; OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30-1.83).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689ce0c924ddd1bd58720https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.047611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proper Utilization of the National Inpatient Sample Database to Analyze Safety of Cardiovascular Procedures2025
  2. 2Periprocedural safety of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation during hospitalization for acute heart failure: a nationwide analysis using the JORAD-PDC database2026
  3. 3Factors impacting complication rates for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation from 2003 to 20152016 · 53 citations
  4. 4Trends in comorbidity burden and periprocedural outcomes among patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation2025
  5. 5Institutional Variation in 30‐Day Complications Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation2022 · 13 citations