PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials1 citations

Experimental investigations on NaOH-treated crumb rubber fly ash bricks

View Full Paper
ATAnkur ThakurSKSENTHIL KASILINGAM

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the feasibility of using crumb rubber to partially replace fine aggregates in fly ash bricks and assess the impact of sodium hydroxide treatment on these materials.
  • Produced fly ash bricks with 3–25% crumb rubber replacement by volume either untreated or treated with sodium hydroxide.
  • Conducted mechanical testing for compressive and flexural strength, and assessed water absorption and initial water absorption rates.
  • Performed scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis to evaluate microstructural properties.
  • Up to 12% crumb rubber replacement showed no significant loss in compressive or flexural strength, with treated bricks outperforming untreated ones.
  • NaOH treatment reduced water absorption slightly (0.65–2%) and improved initial water absorption rates.
  • X-ray diffraction revealed no major changes in crystalline phases between treated and untreated bricks.

Abstract

This study investigated the feasibility of partially replacing fine aggregates with crumb rubber (CR) in fly ash bricks and examines the influence of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) treatment on their performance. Fly ash bricks were produced with 3–25% CR replacement by volume, using both untreated (UM) and NaOH-treated (TM) rubber. Mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties were assessed through compressive and flexural strength tests, water absorption (WA), initial rate of water absorption (IRA), efflorescence testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Results indicate that up to 12% CR replacement caused no significant loss in compressive or flexural strength, with TM bricks consistently outperforming UM bricks. NaOH treatment slightly reduced WA (0.65–2%) and marginally improved IRA values, although SEM revealed more voids in TM specimens at higher CR contents. XRD analysis confirmed no major crystalline phase changes between TM and UM bricks. Limited difference is observed in cost and global warming potential relative to conventional clay bricks. The findings suggest that NaOH-treated CR can be used in fly ash bricks at replacement levels up to 12% without compromising mechanical performance, offering a viable and sustainable alternative for masonry applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thakur et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1689eb0c924ddd1bd58853https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.25.00090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper