PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Evolutionary Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Conservation Units for Anadromous Arctic Char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) in the Canadian Arctic Informed by Genetic Structure, Population Connectivity and Adaptive Genomic Variation

View Full Paper
XDXavier DallaireABAnne BeemelmannsLHLes Harris

Key Points

  • This research aims to define conservation units for anadromous Arctic Char based on genetic structure and adaptive genomic variation.
  • Utilized low-coverage whole-genome data from 30 Arctic Char populations.
  • Delineated conservation units based on population structure and connectivity.
  • Identified genetic adaptations through genome scans and environmental associations.
  • Highlighted two main genetic groups with three candidate CUs each for the North and South regions.
  • Supported by low effective migration rates and isolation-by-environment phenomena.
  • Indicated adaptive differentiation within candidate CUs, enhancing conservation strategies.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Intraspecific genetic diversity is a crucial aspect of biodiversity conservation as it preserves evolutionary potential and enhances resilience to environmental change. Genomic‐informed delineation of Conservation Units (CUs) offers ways of subdividing species into groups based on demographic independence and adaptive differentiation, to develop biologically relevant conservation and management policies. CUs have been defined in many species of harvested anadromous salmonids, but broad‐scale data remain lacking in the Canadian Arctic, where anadromous Arctic Char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) dominates catches in Indigenous‐led subsistence and commercial fisheries. In this study, we use low‐coverage whole‐genome data from 30 Canadian Arctic Char populations to define CUs based on population structure, connectivity, and adaptive genetic variation. We highlight two main genetic groups, each of which comprises three subgroups, or candidate CUs: the North (above the 67th parallel), including the North Baffin Island, Kitikmeot, and Inuvialuit Settlement Region CUs; and the South (below the 67th parallel), including the South Baffin Island, Ungava Bay, and Hudson Bay CUs. This delimitation is supported by areas of low effective migration between candidate CUs, as well as isolation‐by‐environment, which suggests adaptive differentiation. Finally, we discuss opportunities and caveats related to genetic linkage when identifying adaptive variation from whole‐genome sequencing data using genome scans and gene–environment associations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dallaire et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a090c924ddd1bd58abehttps://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper