PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Acta cardiologica. Supplementum1 citations

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched multicentre study

View Full Paper
AAAbdelrahman AssalAZAmr ZakiMLMohamed Loutfi

Key Result

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis achieved 1-year outcomes comparable to tricuspid anatomy for mortality, stroke, and pacemaker implantation (P=0.357).

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve compared to those with tricuspid anatomy.
  • Propensity score matching (1:1) was utilized to balance baseline characteristics between groups.
  • Outcomes were assessed according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria.
  • Follow-up was conducted for up to 12 months post-procedure.
  • No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality between bicuspid and tricuspid groups (p=0.357).
  • Incidences of stroke and new permanent pacemaker implantation at 1 year were similar across both groups.
  • TAVI achieved early and mid-term outcomes in bicuspid valve patients comparable to those with tricuspid valves.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=267)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) achieve comparable safety and efficacy in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis compared to tricuspid aortic valve stenosis?

P
Population
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
C
Comparator
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), 1:1 propensity score matched
O
Outcome
Safety and efficacy outcomes (including all-cause mortality, stroke, and new permanent pacemaker implantation) at 12 months adjudicated by VARC-3 criteriahard clinical

Contemporary TAVI achieves comparable early and mid-term safety and efficacy outcomes in carefully selected patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.357

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current evidence regarding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is primarily based on Western registries, whereas data from Africa and the Middle East are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of contemporary TAVI in patients with BAV, in comparison with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). METHODS: = 267). Outcomes were adjudicated in accordance with Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria, with follow-up extending to 12 months. Propensity score (PS) matching (1:1) was applied to achieve balance in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: = 0.357). The incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke, and new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation at 1 year did not differ meaningfully between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective multicenter cohort, contemporary TAVI achieved early and mid-term outcomes in carefully selected BAV patients comparable to tricuspid anatomy. These findings suggest the feasibility of TAVI in carefully selected BAV anatomies when guided by detailed computed tomography (CT)-based assessment and tailored procedural planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Assal et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (n=267). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) TAVI was evaluated on All-cause mortality, stroke, and new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (p=0.357). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis achieved 1-year outcomes comparable to tricuspid anatomy for mortality, stroke, and pacemaker implantation (P=0.357).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a4b0c924ddd1bd58ea8https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2677227
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Surgical cutdown versus percutaneous access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the B razilian TAVI registry2015 · 26 citations
  2. 2Assessment of TVT and STS Risk Score Performances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2023 · 19 citations
  3. 3Is EuroSCORE II still a reliable predictor for cardiac surgery mortality in 2022? A retrospective study study2022 · 24 citations
  4. 4TAVI for Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Addressing Technical Challenges and Optimizing Outcomes2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2020 · 295 citations