PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Ecological Informatics0 citationsOpen Access

Application and field validation of machine and deep learning models for predicting nitrogen losses in rice paddies with fertilizer deep-placement

View Full Paper
YKYun‐Gu KangJLJun-Yeong LeeJCJiwon Choi

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate machine learning and deep learning models for predicting nitrogen losses from rice paddies with different fertilizer placements.
  • Two machine learning models (random forest, extreme gradient boosting) and one deep learning model (long short-term memory) were developed and validated.
  • A controlled soil incubation experiment (n=285) simulated flooded paddy conditions.
  • Independent field data (n=42) was collected over a 100-day rice cultivation for model validation.
  • The LSTM model explained up to 97% of variability in NH3 emissions and 81% in N2O emissions under field conditions.
  • Cumulative NH3 losses estimated by the LSTM model achieved 94–97% agreement with actual observations.
  • Ensemble ML models demonstrated stable performance under controlled conditions with low variability.

Abstract

Mitigating nitrogen (N) loss from rice paddies is essential for enhancing rice productivity while reducing environmental impacts. This study evaluated two machine learning (ML) models (i.e., random forest and extreme gradient boosting; XGBoost) and one deep learning (DL) model (i.e., long short-term memory; LSTM) for predicting ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions under varying fertilizer deep-placement (FDP) conditions. Models were developed using data from a controlled soil incubation experiment ( n = 285) designed to simulate flooded paddy conditions. The models were subsequently validated using an independent field data ( n = 42) collected during a 100-day rice cultivation period. Input features included fertilization depth, days after fertilization, soil properties, inorganic N content, and atmospheric temperature. Model performance was assessed using four metrics, including coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and root mean squared error (RMSE). Under controlled conditions, the ensemble ML models showed stable and reliable predictive performance, with low variability across cross-validation. In contrast, under field conditions characterized by greater environmental heterogeneity and temporal variability, the LSTM model demonstrated superior predictive performance, explaining up to 81% and 97% of the variability in N 2 O and NH 3 emissions, respectively, under field conditions. The LSTM model also provided reasonable estimates of cumulative NH 3 losses, achieving 94–97% agreement with observations. These results suggest that incorporating temporal dependencies is beneficial for capturing N loss dynamics under open-field conditions. Overall, the findings indicate that LSTM-based approaches can serve as a complementary tool for evaluating FDP effectiveness and supporting improved fertilization management in rice paddies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a640c924ddd1bd590cahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103845
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper