PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Plants0 citationsOpen Access

Diversity Analysis of the Sugar Beet Pathogens ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus’ and ‘Ca. Phytoplasma solani’

View Full Paper
RTRafael TothTKTheresa KaufmannMSMatthias Schulten

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the genetic diversity of two sugar beet pathogens, ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus’ and ‘Ca. Phytoplasma solani’.
  • Conducted a two-year survey in Germany and neighboring countries to collect infected sugar beet samples.
  • Utilized barcoded amplicon sequencing with specific phytoplasma markers for genetic analysis.
  • Compared planthopper samples to sugar beet data to assess variations in genetic diversity.
  • No genetic diversity was detected for ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’.
  • ‘Ca. Phytoplasma solani’ subgroup 16SrXII-A exhibited higher diversity than subgroup 16SrXII-P with various clusters identified.
  • In neighboring countries, 16SrXII-A revealed up to four clusters based on groEL-stamp-nadE sequencing results.

Abstract

Sugar beet cultivation in Europe is threatened by two vector-borne diseases: syndrome “basses richesses”, caused by the phloem-limited pathogen ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus’, and phytoplasmoses associated with ‘Ca. Phytoplasma solani’ subgroup 16SrXII-A and the related subgroup 16SrXII-P. Infections lead to reduced sugar yield, biomass and growth abnormalities. In Germany, Pentastiridius leporinus represents the main vector. Despite their importance, genetic diversity remains poorly understood. During a two-year survey, barcoded amplicons were generated from infected sugar beet samples from Germany and neighbouring countries using the phytoplasma markers 16S rRNA-ITS-23S rRNA, tuf, and groEL-stamp-nadE, as well as rplO-secY-rpmJ and groEL for ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’. Amplicon pools underwent single-molecule real-time sequencing and amplicon-sequence-variant inference. Additionally, planthopper samples from sugar beet in Germany were analysed and compared to sugar beet data for ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’. No genetic diversity of ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ was detected, whereas 16SrXII-A and -P showed variation below the subgroup level. 16SrXII-A exhibited higher diversity than 16SrXII-P. In Germany, 16SrXII-A formed a single cluster, while 16SrXII-P comprised two clusters based on 16S rRNA-ITS-23S rRNA. In neighbouring countries, only 16SrXII-A showed diversity, resolving up to four clusters by groEL-stamp-nadE. These results provide a basis for the identification of dominant strains supporting comparative variety evaluation for tolerance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Toth et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168ae40c924ddd1bd59afdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/plants15111618
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecular detection and multilocus sequence analysis of Candidatus Phytoplasma solani-related strains infecting potato and sugar beet plants in Southern Germany2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Geographical variations, prevalence, and molecular dynamics of fastidious phloem-limited pathogens infecting sugar beet across Central Europe2024 · 10 citations
  3. 3Molecular Detection and Multilocus Sequence Analysis of ‘ <i>Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma Solani’ Strains Infecting Neighbouring Potato and Sugar Beet Fields in Southern Germany2025
  4. 4Pentastiridius leporinus as a Vector of Phloem Restricted Pathogens on Potato: ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Pentastiridius leporinus (Linnaeus, 1761) as a Vector of Phloem-Restricted Pathogens on Potatoes: ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’2024 · 10 citations