PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Planets0 citations

Self‐Similar Initial Morphology of Lunar Simple Craters With Implications for Formation and Degradation Process

View Full Paper
HLHuacheng LiZYZongyu Yue

Key Points

  • To explore the initial morphology of lunar simple craters and understand the impact of degradation on age estimation.
  • Conducted 1,349 numerical simulations of simple crater formations under varying impact velocities (6–20 km/s) and projectile sizes (100–1,000 m).
  • Analyzed crater shapes using dimensionless coordinates normalized by crater radius and depth.
  • Examined variations in depth-to-diameter ratios and their effects on crater age estimation.
  • Crater shapes are self-similar and normalized by size, but the depth-to-diameter ratio fluctuates within size-dependent bounds.
  • Derived crater diameters align with π-scaling laws from lab experiments; however, crater depths and volumes are significantly underestimated by these laws.
  • Using average profiles from simulations results in crater age estimates that differ by 28% compared to those using fresh observed profiles.

Abstract

Abstract Impact craters dominate the lunar surface and morphology‐based dating typically assumes that their initial profiles correspond to the average shape of fresh craters. However, the selected fresh craters may have experienced degradation, and their relationships with impact conditions remain poorly understood. In this study, we present 1,349 numerical simulations of simple crater formations across a wide range of impact conditions (impact velocities of 6–20 km/s and projectile radii of 100–1,000 m). The results show that shapes of simple craters (<15 km in diameter) are self‐similar when described by dimensionless coordinates (normalized by crater radius and depth); however, the depth‐to‐diameter ratio is not constant, revealing a key deviation from the simplification assumed in previous studies. Instead, the depth‐to‐diameter ratio fluctuates within defined, size‐dependent bounds (e.g., to for above impact conditions). We further find that the derived crater diameters are consistent with π‐scaling laws established from laboratory sand experiments, and the crater depths and volumes are notably underestimated by these scaling laws. Additionally, the inherent variations in initial crater morphology due to varied impact conditions introduce an uncertainty of approximately ±17% when estimating ages based on crater morphology degradation. Our results also indicate that if the average crater profile derived from these numerical simulations is used as the initial profile, the resulting crater ages differ by 28% from those obtained using observed profiles of fresh craters. These findings provide crucial guidance for refining techniques to estimate crater ages from their degradation state, thereby offering critical constraints on planetary surface geological processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168b160c924ddd1bd59e87https://doi.org/10.1029/2025je009461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper