PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Frontiers in Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Demographic differences in emotional intelligence and facet-level associations with interpersonal relationships among university teachers in Shandong private universities

View Full Paper
QSQianqian SunFCFang ChenLWLuman Wang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Emotional intelligence (EI) is widely considered a core personal resource for social functioning in educational workplaces, yet evidence remains limited regarding (a) how EI varies across key demographic and work-role characteristics and (b) which EI facets are uniquely associated with workplace interpersonal relationships in private higher education contexts. This study examined EI levels, demographic differences, and face t -level associations with interpersonal relationships among university teachers in Shandong private universities in China. Using a two-stage probability sampling design, survey data were collected from 637 teachers. EI was assessed with a 35-item, five-facet scale (self-awareness, managing emotions, motivating oneself, empathy, and social skill), and interpersonal relationships were measured with a 12-item, four-dimension workplace scale (interpersonal regard, mutual acceptance and facilitation, mutual trust, and workplace harmony), both rated on five-point Likert scales. Overall EI was at a moderate level. Group comparisons showed significant EI differences by gender, age, education, professional title, job role, teaching discipline, and administrative/part-time duty experience, whereas teaching years showed no significant differences. EI was positively associated with interpersonal relationships ( r = 0.570, p 0.01). In multiple regression, the five EI facets jointly accounted for 35.3% of the variance in interpersonal relationships ( R 2 = 0.353), with empathy, social skill, and managing emotions showing significant unique associations, while self-awareness and motivating oneself were not significant. These findings map the demographic distribution of EI in China’s private-university teaching workforce and suggest that interpersonal-facing EI facets may represent particularly relevant targets for relationship-focused faculty development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16d28cc7240d1a707ba809https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1790694
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper