PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Nuclear Physics B0 citationsOpen Access

Comment on “Spontaneous baryosynthesis with large initial phase”

View Full Paper
JCJames M. Cline

Key Points

  • This commentary aims to identify flaws in the derivation of spontaneous baryogenesis yield.
  • Critiques the derivation method used in recent work on baryogenesis yield
  • Compares the current approach with previous models from Dolgov and Freese
  • Focuses on the implications of omitting the small-angle approximation
  • Points out a serious technical shortcoming in the recent derivation
  • Highlights differences between the current analysis and previous findings
  • Suggests that the revised approach may lead to incorrect conclusions

Abstract

Recently https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.11011 set out to improve on previous work from 1994 by Dolgov and Freese, who used a small-angle approximation to derive the yield of spontaneous baryogenesis from a rolling phase, a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson coupled to the baryon current. The goal of the recent paper was to investigate what happens when the small-angle approximation is not imposed. I point out a serious technical shortcoming in their derivation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James M. Cline (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17db293fad632b0f9d7e6fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117524
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper