PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology0 citationsOpen Access

Improving Diagnostic Accuracy for Peripheral Neuropathy: Use of Tibial Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

View Full Paper
MOMiki OkaSTShozo TobimatsuAYAkira Yokote

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine whether combining tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (t-SEPs) and sural nerve sensory conduction study (s-SCS) enhances diagnostic accuracy for peripheral sensory neuropathy.
  • Retrospective review of 74 cases with suspected neuropathy or radiculopathy.
  • Subjects underwent both s-SCS and t-SEPs tests from July 2021 to December 2024.
  • Definitions of abnormal s-SCS and t-SEPs were established for comparison.
  • Group 1 showed no abnormalities in either s-SCS or t-SEPs in 31 limbs (27.2%).
  • Group 2 had normal s-SCSs and abnormal t-SEPs in 45 limbs (39.5%), indicating possible proximal sensory nerve issues.
  • Group 3 revealed abnormalities in both s-SCSs and t-SEPs in 38 limbs (33.3%).

Abstract

Background: We investigated whether combining a sural nerve sensory conduction study (s-SCS) and tibial nerve SEPs (t-SEPs) improves diagnostic accuracy for peripheral sensory neuropathy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 74 consecutive cases (114 lower limbs) of patients suspected of having neuropathy or radiculopathy who underwent s-SCSs and t-SEPs between July 2021 and December 2024. Abnormal S-SCSs were defined as a reduction in amplitude or a slowing of conduction velocity. Abnormal t-SEPs were defined as failure to evoke N20 or P37, or prolonged latency of either. Results: No cases showed s-SCS abnormalities with normal t-SEPs. Then, we classified the groups based on the combination of abnormality of s-SCSs and t-SEPs. Group 1 (G1) had normal s-SCSs and normal t-SEPs, which were observed in 31 limbs (27.2%). Group 2 (G2) had normal s-SCSs and abnormal t-SEPs, which were found in 45 limbs (39.5%). Subgroups of G2 included normal N20 with abnormal P37, abnormal N20 with normal P37, and N20/P37 abnormalities. Group 3 (G3) had abnormal s-SCSs with abnormal t-SEPs, which were seen in 38 limbs (33.3%). Conclusions: Electrophysiological testing reveals normal distal and proximal sensory nerves in G1, suggesting preserved sensory nerve function. The distal sensory nerves are normal in G2. However, abnormal N20/P37 and abnormal N20 with normal P37 indicate proximal sensory nerve involvement. Normal N20 with abnormal P37 indicates posterior column dysfunction. In G3, both the distal and proximal sensory nerve segments are abnormal. Therefore, adding t-SEPs to s-SCSs allows us to evaluate the full length of the peripheral nerves, which is useful for diagnosis and assessing treatment efficacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dbbe3fad632b0f9d87cfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper