PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Multimedia Tools and Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Deep self-supervised learning algorithm applied to tone-mapped image quality assessment

View Full Paper
PPPedro de Carvalho Cayres PintoGNGustavo Martins da Silva NunesFOFernanda D. V. R. Oliveira

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance tone-mapped image quality assessment by modifying the Barlow twins algorithm.
  • Adapts Barlow twins algorithm to train CNNs specific for tone-mapped image quality.
  • Employs support vector regression to map quality features extracted from CNNs into an overall quality score.
  • Conducts intra-dataset and cross-dataset experiments using three different image quality databases.
  • Achieves a 1.2% improvement in Pearson correlation coefficient for intra-dataset experiments compared to state-of-the-art.
  • Observes quality assessment improvements of up to 55.2% in cross-dataset experiments.
  • Proposed metrics outperform three existing metrics based on hand-crafted features.

Abstract

Abstract We propose modifying the Barlow twins (BT) algorithm, to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) which extract features that are specifically tailored for tone-mapped image quality assessment (TMIQA). In BT, a CNN is trained with pairs of images that are similar in terms of visual content. In our modified approach, pairs of images sampled from the dataset are similar in terms of image quality rather than visual content. This modification makes the feature vectors more suitable for TMIQA. Using quality features extracted from such CNNs, we train support vector regression (SVR) models that map such features into a score that summarizes the overall quality impression of an image. We denote the composition of feature extractor with SVR model as a metric. We use three datasets in our experiments: patch-based tone-mapping database (PBTDB), embedded signal processing laboratory (ESPL), and tone-mapped image database (TMID). We compare our metrics with three TMIQA metrics that are based on hand-crafted features: blind tone-mapped quality index (BTMQI), high dynamic range image gradient based evaluator-1 (HIGRADE-1), and HIGRADE-2. We perform nine experiments: three intra-dataset experiments, that involve training and testing on the same dataset; and six cross-dataset experiments, that involve training on one dataset and testing on a different dataset. The proposed metrics are advantageous in six experiments. In terms of the Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and ground-truth mean opinion score values, our best results in the intra-dataset experiments show an improvement over the state-of-the-art by 1.2%. In the cross-dataset experiments, we observe improvements up to 55.2%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pinto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dbbe3fad632b0f9d87e7https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-026-21697-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Review of Image Quality Assessment Methods for Compressed Images2024 · 23 citations
  2. 2ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database2009 · 63,260 citations
  3. 3SimCLR-based Self-Supervised Learning Approach for Limited Brain MRI and Unlabeled Images2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition1998 · 59,575 citations
  5. 5Deep Spatial Adaptive Network for Real Image Demosaicing2022 · 24 citations