PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026The American Journal of Gastroenterology0 citations

Esophageal clearance assessed by high-resolution impedance manometry in achalasia: a prospective study with 1-year follow-up

View Full Paper
ABA BergerFGFlorian GrousezÍMÍngrid Marín

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare high resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) and timed barium esophagram (TBE) in evaluating esophageal clearance after POEM in achalasia.
  • Monocentric prospective study with external validation.
  • Assessment of 103 patients undergoing POEM using HRiM and TBE pre- and post-procedure at 3 months.
  • Follow-up of treatment success defined by Eckardt score after 12 months.
  • 97 patients completed 12-month follow-up with 90% success rate for POEM.
  • Both HRiM and TBE showed significant improvement in esophageal clearance post-procedure.
  • For predicting treatment failure, HRiM had 66% sensitivity, 82% specificity, and TBE had 100% sensitivity, 59% specificity.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Timed barium esophagram (TBE) is widely used to evaluate esophageal clearance (EC) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia. Our aim was to compare high resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) and TBE for assessment of esophageal clearance following POEM in achalasia. Methods: We conducted a monocentric prospective study with external validation to compare EC assessed by HRiM (EC-HRiM) in response to a 200 mL rapid drink challenge and TBE (EC-TBE) after POEM for achalasia, and to evaluate their diagnostic performance, reproducibility, and predictive value for long-term clinical success. Consecutive patients undergoing POEM were assessed pre- and post-procedure at 3 months using Eckardt score, HRiM, and TBE. Treatment failure was defined by an Eckardt score >3 at 12 months. Results: In the prospective cohort (n=103; 65% male; median age 62 yrs) 97 patients completed the 12-month follow-up, with a POEM success rate of 90%. EC significantly improved post-POEM using both HRiM and TBE. Interobserver reproducibility and correlation with Eckardt score were high for both EC-HRiM and EC-TBE. Meaningful thresholds for prediction of failure at 12 months were any residual bolus (>0 cm) for EC-HRiM and 9-cm bolus height for EC-TBE at 3 months. Using these cut-offs, the diagnostic performance for predicting treatment failure for EC-HRiM and EC-TBE were respectively: sensitivity 66% vs. 100%, specificity 82% vs. 59%, PPV 30% vs. 19%, and NPV 95% vs. 100%. Similar results were obtained in the external validation cohort Conclusion: HRiM is a reliable, reproducible tool for assessment of esophageal clearance post-POEM.(Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT06230536).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dcbb3fad632b0f9d9787https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia2010 · 1,823 citations
  2. 2Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0 ©2020 · 1,069 citations
  3. 3Pneumatic dilation for achalasia: late results of a prospective follow up investigation2004 · 270 citations
  4. 4Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment2002 · 315 citations
  5. 5Improved Assessment of Bolus Clearance in Patients With Achalasia Using High-Resolution Impedance Manometry2018 · 33 citations