This paper develops a compact formal semantics for selector-relative lawlessness. The motivating claim is that a lawless substrate is not a stochastic object, not an algorithmically random sequence, and not a probability space with a missing measure. It is an object whose specified reachable structural fragment lacks stable classical valuation relative to a specified class of selectors. We use Priest-style paraconsistent logic LP instrumentally. The non-classical value is read as pre-selective structural over-admissibility: before selection, mutually incompatible structural continuations may remain jointly admissible without either being intrinsically encoded in the substrate. To avoid collapsing over-admissibility into mere inaccessibility, the LP layer is restricted to a reachable structural fragment. Selectors are modeled as resolution operators that convert unresolved structural valuations into classical or partially classical observable structure. The framework proves elementary but useful facts about selector relativity, residual lawlessness, monotonicity under selector extension, incomplete resolution, and the post-selective status of probability.
Aleksandar Bakalov (Tue,) studied this question.