PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2026Frontiers in Pediatrics0 citationsOpen Access

Systems perspectives on pediatric otitis media: environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and biomarker-guided interventions

View Full Paper
YYYa YuRYRui YuanJZJingqi Zhang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Pediatric otitis media remains one of the most common childhood diseases worldwide and is a major cause of hearing impairment, recurrent healthcare utilization, and antibiotic exposure. Its pathogenesis is highly heterogeneous and can no longer be adequately explained by a traditional single-pathogen model. Objective: This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the roles of environmental exposures, host genetic susceptibility, biomarkers, and microbial factors in pediatric otitis media, with particular emphasis on their interactions and translational relevance. Content: Current evidence suggests that early-life environmental exposures may contribute to pediatric otitis media through convergent pathways involving epithelial dysfunction, impaired mucociliary clearance, inflammation, oxidative stress, and altered immune regulation, while host genetic variation may further modify susceptibility and disease heterogeneity. Emerging biomarker and microbial studies also support a systems-level understanding of pediatric otitis media and its therapeutic complexity. Conclusion: Pediatric otitis media should be understood as a multifactorial disorder arising from dynamic interactions among environmental exposures, host susceptibility, and microbial ecology. This integrated framework extends beyond pathogen-centered models and provides a conceptual basis for future biomarker validation, mechanistic stratification, and the development of more precise preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18ccad9b18e8e1efcfb664https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1758098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nasopharyngeal Carriage of Potential Bacterial Pathogens Related to Day Care Attendance, with Special Reference to the Molecular Epidemiology of Haemophilus influenzae2002 · 90 citations
  2. 2Genetic Elements Carrying erm (B) in Streptococcus pyogenes and Association with tet (M) Tetracycline Resistance Gene2007 · 113 citations
  3. 3A greater effect on clarithromycin resistance of mef(A)‐associated msr(D) than mef(E)‐associated msr(D) in Streptococcus pyogenes2022 · 4 citations
  4. 4Natural transformation allows transfer of SCCmec-mediated methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms2022 · 103 citations
  5. 5Gstm1/Gstt1 is essential for reducing cisplatin ototoxicity in CBA/CaJ mice2022 · 11 citations