PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma0 citations

Significant variations in first-line mantle cell lymphoma care—an Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry study

View Full Paper
ZLZoe LohECEliza ChungCWCameron Wellard

Key Points

  • To assess treatment variations and outcomes in first-line mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) care across different age groups in Australia.
  • Registry analysis of patients with mantle cell lymphoma receiving first-line treatment
  • Assessment of treatment regimens including cytarabine-containing chemoimmunotherapy and bendamustine-rituximab
  • Evaluation of autologous stem cell transplant rates and overall survival outcomes
  • 44% of patients underwent autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)
  • Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 54% (95% CI 45-62)
  • Three-year overall survival (OS) was 68% (95% CI 59-74)

Abstract

= 85/105) received cytarabine-containing chemoimmunotherapy compared to 23% in those over 65 years. Only 48% of older patients received bendamustine-rituximab based regimens. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was performed in 44% of patients (aged 43-70 years) and 13% received maintenance rituximab (MR). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 54% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-62) and 68% (59-74), respectively. In those ≤70 years, ASCT was not associated with PFS or OS. This registry analysis highlights considerable variability in upfront MCL therapy with low ASCT and MR use, providing an important benchmark for emerging standards of care in Australia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Loh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192cb4fab5b468c44157b8https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2026.2673099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive (TN) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): Results from the Phase 2 TrAVeRse study2025 · 12 citations
  2. 2Four‐year follow‐up of a single arm, phase II clinical trial of ibrutinib with rituximab ( IR ) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma ( MCL )2018 · 64 citations
  3. 3Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project2010 · 971 citations
  4. 4Frontline bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in transplantation-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: final overall survival results of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study2018 · 143 citations
  5. 5Advances in biomarkers for mantle cell lymphoma in the era of targeted therapies2025 · 3 citations