PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026BMC Medical Education0 citationsOpen Access

From operating room to leadership room: a systematic review of simulation-based interventions for leadership development in general surgery

NGNadia GulnazFSFaiza H SoomroINIzza Nazir

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the effects of simulation-based leadership training on behavioral and safety-related outcomes in surgical environments.
  • Systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, including studies focused on leadership or non-technical skills using simulation in surgery.
  • Twelve studies with a total of 430 participants involving multidisciplinary teams were analyzed.
  • Risk of bias evaluated with ROBINS-I and RoB-2, and visualized using the robvis platform.
  • Leadership performance improved with gains of 2-4 points on behavioral scales.
  • Communication and teamwork scores increased by approximately 2-3 points, with Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) domain means between 2.8-3.5.
  • Checklist-supported teams only missed 6% of critical actions.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of simulation-based leadership training on behavioral and safety-related outcomes in surgical and clinical environments. Leadership and non-technical skills (NTS) are critical for safe surgical practice. Simulation-based education can be helpful in the improvement of these skills. While simulation-based education is widely used to improve technical skills, its influence on leadership, teamwork, and patient safety outcomes is reported inconsistently. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, studies evaluating leadership or NTS using simulation within surgical or perioperative contexts were included. Study characteristics, simulation format, assessment frameworks, leadership outcomes, and patient safety indicators were extracted. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and RoB-2, and visualised through the robvis platform. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 430 participants met inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 14-69; most involving multidisciplinary teams of 2-6 members. High-fidelity modalities were used in approximately 70% of studies, while others incorporated wet-lab, video-based, or in-situ simulations. Leadership performance improved, with reported gains of 2-4 points on behavioral scales. Communication and teamwork scores increased by approximately 2-3 points, and Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) domain means typically ranged from 2.8-3.5 on 4-point scales. Technical performance differences between senior and junior trainees averaged 30-40%. Checklist-supported teams missed only 6% of critical actions. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training was consistently associated with improvements in leadership, communication, teamwork, and safety-related performance across surgical and multidisciplinary settings. Although results were positive, heterogeneity in design and measurement shows the need for further high-quality, standardised research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gulnaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192cd5fab5b468c4415a49https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09486-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper