PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Comorbidity-related medical expenditures and health outcomes in cancer patients.

View Full Paper
PXPanpan XiaoBWBo WangHLHerbert H. Loong

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare healthcare expenditures and health outcomes for cancer patients with comorbidities to those without.
  • Longitudinal analysis using 2008-2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data.
  • Participants included adults with one or more chronic conditions classified by self-reported cancer history.
  • Healthcare utilization and expenditures were analyzed using generalized linear and negative binomial regression models.
  • Cancer patients had more comorbidity-specific home health visits (IRR 2.01, 95% CI 1.13-3.57) but lower total expenditures (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92).
  • Reduced hospitalization and out-of-pocket costs for various conditions were reported in cancer patients.
  • Cancer patients exhibited greater functional limitations and lower health quality measures compared to non-cancer patients.

Abstract

1641 Background: Comorbidities are common among adults with cancer and necessitate effective medical management. However, research is scarce on how cancer affects healthcare utilization and expenditures for comorbid conditions. This study used a U.S. database to compare medical expenditures and health outcomes between adults with comorbidities who have cancer and those without. Methods: This longitudinal analysis utilized the data from the 2008-2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (Household Component). Participants with one or more of 19 chronic health conditions (ICD-9 coded) relevant to primary care were classified based on self-reported cancer history. Outcomes from the second year of each panel (2009-2015) included comorbidity-specific healthcare utilization, medical expenditures, functional status, HRQoL, and health utility. Cost differences conditional on positive expenditures were analyzed using generalized linear models (gamma regression and log-link), while differences in healthcare utilization were examined using negative binomial regression. All models were adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle covariates. Results: A weighted total of 24,057,137 adults with at least one comorbidity (mean age 58.3±15.8 years; 59% female) were included, of whom 10% (n=2,393,300) reported a history of cancer. Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients received more comorbidity-specific home health visits (IRR 2.01, 95% CI 1.13-3.57) but had lower total comorbidity-specific expenditures (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92). Cancer patients also incurred lower comorbidity-specific hospitalization costs and out-of-pocket costs for emergency department (ED) visits (p<0.05). Specifically, they had reduced total expenditures for arthritis (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.93) and stomach problems (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81) and reduced out-of-pocket costs for thyroid problems (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.86) and osteoporosis (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.92). Among multimorbid patients (≥2 conditions; 55.4%), cancer patients incurred lower out-of-pocket costs for ED visits (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.68). For health outcomes, cancer patients reported more functional limitations than non-cancer patients in instrumental activities of daily living (10.8% vs 8.5%), role functioning (26.2% vs 20.5%), and cognitive function (13.6% vs 11.2%), all p<0.05. Moreover, multimorbid patients with cancer had lower HRQoL and health utilities (p<0.05). Similar trends were observed for cancer patients with depression, hypertension, chronic lung disease, osteoporosis, and thyroid problems. Conclusions: Cancer patients with comorbidities had greater functional limitations but lower medical expenditures for comorbidity care than non-cancer patients, suggesting inequities in primary care. Healthcare resources should be prioritized for cancer patients with comorbidities and poor functional status.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d65fab5b468c44164dahttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1641
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper