PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Additional health-related quality of life (HRQoL) analysis from DESTINY-Gastric04 (DG-04), a randomized phase 3 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs ramucirumab (RAM) + paclitaxel (PTX) in patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA).

View Full Paper
KSKohei ShitaraAZAziz ZaananSLSara Lonardi

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to detail health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for patients with HER2+ unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer treated with T-DXd versus standard therapy.
  • Patients with HER2+ unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer received either T-DXd or RAM + PTX.
  • HRQoL was evaluated using the FACT-Ga scale and EQ-5D-5L VAS at specified time points.
  • Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was utilized to analyze changes in CFB of the FACT-Ga scale.
  • Median time to first deterioration (TTFD) was longer for T-DXd versus RAM + PTX for EQ-5D-5L VAS (3.5 vs 3.0 mo; HR 0.79, P=0.063).
  • Significant TTFD improvement observed for FACT-G total score (3.5 vs 2.8 mo; HR 0.74, P=0.015).
  • Emotional well-being scoring also favored T-DXd with TTFD of 5.1 months vs 3.7 months for RAM + PTX (HR 0.74, P=0.026).

Abstract

4111 Background: In DG-04 (NCT04704934), a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival was seen with T-DXd vs RAM + PTX in pts with HER2+ unresectable/metastatic GC/GEJA in the second-line setting. Patient-reported HRQoL was also maintained with T-DXd. We report additional HRQoL results from DG-04. Methods: Pts with unresectable/metastatic GC/GEJA who were HER2+ (IHC 3+, IHC 2+/ISH+) by local or central testing received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg or RAM + PTX. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at prespecified time points using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric (FACT-Ga) scale and the EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) visual analog scale (VAS). Time to first deterioration (TTFD) and mean change from baseline (CFB) were assessed. Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to analyze CFB of the FACT-Ga scale. Results: At data cutoff (October 24, 2024), median TTFD favored T-DXd (n = 246) vs RAM + PTX (n = 248) for the EQ-5D-5L VAS (3.5 vs 3.0 mo; hazard ratio HR, 0.79; nominal P = 0.063), FACT-General (G) total score (3.5 vs 2.8 mo; HR, 0.74; nominal P = 0.015), and FACT-Ga emotional well-being (EWB; 5.1 vs 3.7 mo; HR, 0.74; nominal P = 0.026) and social well-being (SWB; 3.8 vs 2.5 mo; HR, 0.71; nominal P = 0.006) subscales. Additional TTFD results, including TTFD in gastric cancer subscale (GaCS) and physical well-being (PWB), are in the Table. Mean CFB scores remained stable in all FACT-Ga subscales, with no clinically meaningful changes associated with T-DXd. MMRM analysis of CFB results favored T-DXd vs RAM + PTX for the FACT-G total score (nominal P = 0.023), and the FACT-Ga functional well-being (FWB; nominal P = 0.045) and SWB (nominal P = 0.004) subscales. Conclusions: These findings support patient-reported HRQoL was maintained with T-DXd in pts with HER2+ unresectable/metastatic GC/GEJA. TTFD was not negatively impacted with T-DXd; mean CFB in all FACT-Ga subscales showed pt symptoms and functioning remained stable, with some subscales favoring T-DXd vs RAM + PTX. Clinical trial information: NCT04704934 . T-DXdn=246 RAM + PTXn=248 HR (95% CI)Nominal P Value EQ-5D-5L VAS, median TTFD (95% CI), mo 3.5 (2.7-5.0) 3.0 (2.1-3.5) 0.79 (0.62-1.01)0.063 FACT-Ga scale, median TTFD (95% CI), mo FACT-G (EWB + FWB + PWB + SWB) 3.5 (2.2-4.4) 2.8 (2.1-3.5) 0.74 (0.58-0.95)0.015 FACT-Ga total score (FACT-G + GaCS) 4.4 (3.5-5.7) 4.4 (3.5-6.5) 0.95 (0.73-1.24)0.700 EWB 5.1 (4.2-8.7) 3.7 (2.4-5.0) 0.74 (0.57-0.97)0.026 FWB 2.3 (2.1-3.2) 2.3 (2.1-3.5) 0.89 (0.70-1.13)0.338 PWB 2.8 (2.1-3.7) 2.2 (2.1-3.1) 0.79 (0.62-1.00)0.052 SWB 3.8 (2.6-5.3) 2.5 (2.1-3.5) 0.71 (0.55-0.91)0.006 GaCS 4.9 (3.7-6.3) 5.8 (4.8-7.4) 1.11 (0.84-1.47)0.462

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shitara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d7efab5b468c4416659https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.4111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1188P A health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) analysis from DESTINY-Breast04: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs capecitabine (CAP) in patients (Pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC)2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Comparative effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus real-world treatment in HER2-amplified advanced solid tumors detected by cell-free DNA: An exploratory analysis of the HERALD trial and GOZILA study.2026
  3. 3Abstract PS5-01-30: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): Final analysis from DESTINY-Breast032026 · 1 citations
  4. 4A DESTINY-Breast09 analysis of treatment duration and clinical outcomes by best response to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) + pertuzumab (P).2026 · 3 citations
  5. 5Disitamab vedotin (DV) plus toripalimab (Tor) and chemotherapy (Chemo)/trastuzumab (Tra) for first-line (1L) HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic (la/m) gastric cancer (GC): Updated results from the RC48-C027 trial.2026