PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Languages and Translation0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Different Conversational Techniques on Obviating Conversational Problems of Intermediate Iranian EFL Learners

View Full Paper
MDMohsen Banisharif Dehkordi

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate how different conversational techniques affect conversational challenges and speaking performance in Iranian EFL learners.
  • Conducted on 45 EFL learners divided into three groups: Role Play, Interview, and Small Group Discussion.
  • Utilized the Oxford Placement Test for homogeneity and performed a pretest and post-test to assess speaking skills.
  • Each group received 3 sessions per week for 2 months focusing on their specific conversational technique.
  • Role Play Group (RG) significantly outperformed the Interview Group (IG) and Small Group Discussion Group (SG) in post-test speaking performance.
  • IG performed better than SG in speaking tasks.
  • Questionnaire results indicated positive attitudes toward role play and interview techniques, while SG showed negative attitudes toward small group discussions.

Abstract

This study explored the impact of three conversational techniques—role play, interview, and small group discussion—on addressing conversational challenges among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. It also examined learners' attitudes toward these techniques. The sample included 45 male and female EFL learners divided into three intact classes, each forming an experimental group: Role Play Group (RG), Interview Group (IG), and Small Group Discussion Group (SG), with 15 learners in each. After administering the Oxford Placement Test (OPT) to ensure a homogeneous proficiency level, participants completed a pretest to assess their initial speaking performance. Over two months, the groups received instruction in speaking skills using their assigned conversational techniques during three 55-minute weekly sessions. RG practiced role play through assigned roles and class performances, IG conducted interviews in small groups with rotating roles, and SG engaged in topic-based small group discussions. A post-test, designed at the same proficiency level as the pretest, was used to evaluate improvements in speaking performance. The results indicated that RG participants significantly outperformed their peers, with IG achieving better outcomes than SG. To assess learners’ perceptions, a questionnaire with Likert-scale items was administered. Findings revealed positive attitudes toward role play and interviews among RG and IG participants, while SG participants expressed negative attitudes toward small group discussions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohsen Banisharif Dehkordi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192da0fab5b468c4416720https://doi.org/10.71864/lct-2026-1225732
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper