PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography0 citations

Virtual Noncontrast Images Derived From Photon-Counting CT Enhance Inter-Reader Reproducibility of Myocardial ECV Measurement in Patients With Cardiac Devices

View Full Paper
YYYosuke YamakamiKHKensuke HirasawaHHHiroto Hada

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess whether a virtual noncontrast method using photon-counting CT improves the reproducibility of myocardial ECV measurements in complex patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 59 patients undergoing photon-counting CT, classified into three groups: control, atrial fibrillation, and cardiac implants.
  • Myocardial ECV was measured using standard subtraction and virtual noncontrast methods.
  • Reproducibility was evaluated through intraclass correlation coefficients and mean absolute error.
  • In the cardiac implant group, VNC method showed significantly lower interobserver mean absolute error (1.66% vs. 2.54%, P=0.029).
  • No significant differences were found in the AF (1.35% vs. 1.54%, P=0.648) or control (1.39% vs. 1.68%, P=0.674) groups.
  • VNC method demonstrated good to excellent interobserver (ICCs >0.89) and intraobserver (ICCs >0.90) agreement.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The standard 2-scan computed tomography (CT) for quantifying the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) of the left ventricle is limited by misregistration errors, particularly in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or cardiac implants such as prosthetic valves and/or cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). This study aimed to evaluate whether a single-scan virtual noncontrast (VNC) method using photon-counting CT (PCCT) improves the reproducibility of measurement compared with the standard subtraction method in these challenging patient populations. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients undergoing PCCT, stratified into the following 3 groups: control (n=20), AF (n=20), and cardiac implants, including prosthetic valves and/or CIEDs (n=19). Myocardial ECV was quantified using both standard subtraction and VNC methods. Reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and mean absolute error. RESULTS: In the cardiac implant group, the VNC method demonstrated a significantly lower interobserver mean absolute error compared with the standard subtraction method (1.66% vs. 2.54%, P=0.029). No significant differences were observed in the AF (1.35% vs. 1.54%, P=0.648) or control (1.39% vs. 1.68%, P=0.674) groups. The VNC method demonstrated good to excellent interobserver (all ICCs >0.89) and intraobserver (all ICCs >0.90) agreement. Intraobserver agreement was also excellent for both methods, with no significant difference between them. CONCLUSIONS: The PCCT-derived VNC method significantly improves interobserver reproducibility of ECV measurement in patients with cardiac devices, establishing it as a more reproducible technique for myocardial tissue characterization in this challenging population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yamakami et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192de6fab5b468c4416dd2https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001880
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper