PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Overall survival subgroup analyses for prior taxane use in the phase 3 ROSELLA trial of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (GOG-3073, ENGOT-ov72, APGOT-Ov10, LACOG-0223, and ANZGOG-2221/2023).

View Full Paper
LGLucy GilbertBYBenoit YouAOAlexander Olawaiye

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effect of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel on overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, specifically considering prior taxane use.
  • Patients (n = 381) were randomized 1:1 to receive relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel alone.
  • The final overall survival analysis occurred after 288 deaths with a median follow-up of 24.8 months.
  • Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used for analysis of survival rates.
  • Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83; P = 0.0004).
  • Median OS was 16.0 months for the combination versus 11.9 months for nab-paclitaxel alone, a difference of 4.1 months.
  • Subgroup analyses indicated a consistent OS benefit across different taxane-free intervals and recent taxane use.

Abstract

5503 Background: Relacorilant is a first-in-class, selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonist that increases tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. The phase 3 ROSELLA trial of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) recently reported statistically significant results for the dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The relacorilant combination was well tolerated and the safety profile was similar to nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Here we present final OS subgroup analyses for prior taxane use. Methods: Patients (n = 381) were randomized 1:1 to relacorilant (150 mg PO the day before, of, and after nab-paclitaxel) plus nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or nab-paclitaxel alone (100 mg/m 2 IV on the same schedule). The final OS analysis was performed after 288 deaths had been reported (76% maturity). The hazard ratio (HR) was estimated with a Cox regression model with treatment group as the main effect and stratification factors at randomization as covariates. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate medians and generate survival curves. Results: At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, the addition of relacorilant to nab-paclitaxel resulted in a statistically and clinically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.65; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.51 to 0.83; P = 0.0004). Median OS in the relacorilant combination arm was extended by 4.1 months compared with the nab-paclitaxel monotherapy arm (16.0 vs 11.9 months). Prior taxane use was almost universal (n = 379/381, 99.5%). A consistent OS benefit was observed irrespective of the taxane-free interval: taxane-free interval ≤6 months (n = 55, HR 0.60 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.15, median difference 5.7 months) and taxane-free interval > 6 months (n = 324, HR 0.66 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.86, median difference 3.6 months). Moreover, a consistent OS benefit was observed irrespective of whether a taxane was used in the most recent regimen: taxane in the last regimen (n = 73, HR 0.67 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.19, median difference 3.9 months) and no taxane in the last regimen (n = 308, HR 0.63 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.82, median difference 4.2 months). Additional safety data will be presented. Conclusions: ROSELLA met both dual primary endpoints. Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant OS benefit in patients with PROC compared to a weekly taxane, the most efficacious chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses for OS showed a consistent benefit favoring the addition of relacorilant to nab-paclitaxel irrespective of prior taxane use. Clinical trial information: NCT05257408 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gilbert et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192de6fab5b468c4416e02https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5503
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper