PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Clinical Pediatrics0 citations

Clinical Significance of a New Z-Score Calculator in Pediatric Patients With Kawasaki Disease

View Full Paper
KHKathryn W. HolmesJSJuliana SarwarySMSheila Markwardt

Key Points

  • This research investigates the clinical implications of using dual Z-score reporting for coronary dilation in children with Kawasaki disease.
  • Retrospective review of echocardiograms from 47 Kawasaki disease patients at a single institution from January 2019 to November 2021.
  • Comparison of coronary artery dimensions using Boston Children's Hospital and Pediatric Heart Network reference systems.
  • Assessment of discordance in echocardiogram interpretations by cardiologists.
  • PHN Z-scores for LMCA and LAD were larger than Boston by 15% and 13%, respectively.
  • Among discordances, cardiologists were split on interpretations; 2 incomplete KD diagnoses were attributed solely to PHN-determined LAD dilation.
  • Mean normalization time of coronary arteries was 33 days by PHN versus 12 days by Boston.

Abstract

This study examined the real-world impact of simultaneous dual Z-score reporting on the interpretation of coronary dilation in Kawasaki disease (KD). Two widely used reference systems exist for evaluating coronary artery dimensions in children: Boston Children's Hospital (Boston) and Pediatric Heart Network (PHN). We retrospectively reviewed KD echocardiograms performed at a single institution between January 2019 and November 2021; 47 KD patients were included. The PHN Z-scores for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) and left anterior descending (LAD) were larger than those of Boston, resulting in 15% of LAD and 13% of LMCA measurements classified as dilated by PHN but normal by Boston. Among discordant echocardiograms, cardiologists were evenly split on which system was cited, with 2 incomplete KD diagnoses confirmed solely on LAD dilation identified by PHN. Coronary normalization took a mean of 33 days by PHN vs 12 days by Boston. Simultaneous dual reporting introduces clinically meaningful discordance, warranting guideline standardization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holmes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e39fab5b468c44172cchttps://doi.org/10.1177/00099228261452213
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper