PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Cybersecurity Education Research and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

A GovSecOps-Oriented Governance, Risk, and Compliance Platform for Continuous Authorization in DoD IL4/IL5 Environments

AJAnand Janjal

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop and evaluate a GRC architecture for continuous authorization in DoD IL4/IL5 environments.
  • Developed a GovSecOps-oriented GRC architecture integrating key components like vulnerability ingestion and risk scoring.
  • Conducted a quantitative simulation experiment using a synthetic dataset of 1,200 vulnerabilities across 150 assets.
  • Performed a comparative multi-case study across cloud-native, hybrid, and legacy environments.
  • A statistically significant reduction in remediation cycle time by 38.2% (p < 0.001).
  • Demonstrated improved documentation efficiency.
  • Findings indicate enhanced governance transparency and improved authorization responsiveness.

Abstract

Department of Defense (DoD) Impact Level 4 and Impact Level 5 (IL4/IL5) systems require continuous assurance of cybersecurity posture under stringent operational and regulatory constraints. While the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) and DoD DevSecOps guidance emphasize continuous authorization supported by real-time evidence, many existing Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) platforms remain documentation-centric and insufficiently integrated with operational telemetry. This paper presents a GovSecOps-oriented GRC architecture that integrates vulnerability ingestion, automated Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) lifecycle management, dynamic risk scoring, and continuous authorization dashboards within IL4/IL5 environments. Using a Design Science Research methodology, the study develops and evaluates the architecture through a quantitative simulation experiment based on a synthetic dataset of 1,200 vulnerabilities across 150 assets. Results demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in remediation cycle time (mean reduction: 38.2%, p < 0.001) and improved documentation efficiency. A comparative multi-case study across cloud-native, hybrid, and legacy environments further evaluates feasibility under varying operational conditions. These findings indicate that embedding compliance workflows directly into operational telemetry pipelines improves authorization responsiveness and enhances governance transparency in high-assurance defense environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anand Janjal (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e4efab5b468c441755fhttps://doi.org/10.62915/2472-2707.1299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A GovSecOps-Oriented Governance, Risk, and Compliance Platform for Continuous Authorization in DoD IL4/IL5 Environments: Architecture, Quantitative Evaluation, and Multi-Case Study Analysis2026
  2. 2OpenGRCRMF: A Vendor-Neutral Framework for Teaching and Modeling RMF Automation, Continuous Authorization, and Zero Trust Governance2026
  3. 3Rules-as-Code Cloud Assurance For Federal Suppliers: Converting NIST SSDF And Patch/Update Controls Into Machine-Readable Authorization Evidence2025
  4. 4DevSecOps-Driven Security Framework for CI/CD Pipeline Risk Mitigation2025
  5. 5Corporate Governance, Risk Allocation, and Compliance Frameworks in Enterprise Systems Infrastructure2026