In the context of globalization of the educational space and increasing competition among universities for attracting students, faculty, and funding, the formation of a unique institutional identity is acquiring strategic importance. The subject of the study is the university design code as a multi-level semiotic system integrating visual, verbal, behavioral, environmental, and digital components of institutional identity. The object of the study is the body of official visual identity standards of universities from six regions of the world — Russia, Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia, and Africa — considered as sign systems conveying the values, mission, and culture of an educational institution across various audience touchpoints. Special attention is given to the evolution of approaches to university brand management — from the heraldic and corporate phases (1960s–1990s) to the contemporary ecosystem phase — as well as to the typology of design standards by volume and level of detail, regional models of visual identity management, and the key components of the design code. The study employs content analysis of official brandbooks and visual identity guidelines of universities, comparative analysis of regional approaches, typologization of design standards, and analysis of universities' marketing activities. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive comparative analysis of visual identity systems of universities from six world regions within a unified semiotic framework. A typology of design standards by volume and level of detail is proposed; models of visual identity management are identified (strict centralization, coordinated decentralization, and fragmented identity); and clusters of individual university images are described: "research frontier," "creative hub," "digital corporate campus," "social elevator," "elite global brand," and "regional champion." It is established that more than 80% of leading universities worldwide possess formalized visual identity systems, while a significant gap persists between the leaders (the United States, Western Europe, and leading Russian universities) and the majority of universities in Africa and Asia. The key finding is that the modern university design code has transformed from a set of graphic regulations into a dynamic brand management platform integrating semiotic, communicative, and environmental dimensions of identity and ensuring its resilience in the context of digitalization, inclusivity, and audience diversity.
Михаил Сергеевич Пашоликов (Fri,) studied this question.