PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Data‐Driven Prediction of Photovoltaic Inverter Temperature Using Operational Dashboard Data: A Comparative Machine Learning Study

View Full Paper
TNTue Duy NguyenHBHien Van BuiTTTrieu Ngoc Ton

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a data-driven method for predicting photovoltaic inverter temperature using online monitoring data.
  • Evaluated five machine-learning models: decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, histogram-based gradient boosting, XGBoost.
  • Used standard operational data from monitoring dashboards to predict inverter temperature.
  • Focused on interpretability through SHAP analysis.
  • Random forest model achieved R2 of 0.9947, RMSE of 0.601°C, and MAE of 0.471°C on an independent test set.
  • Subdegree accuracy (< 1°C) achieved with seven input features.
  • Identified inverse relationship between reactive power and inverter temperature using SHAP analysis.

Abstract

Effective thermal management is crucial to PV inverter reliability and lifetime, as power electronic components are highly sensitive to thermal stress. However, many existing monitoring methods rely on complex simulations or costly experiments. This study proposes a data‐driven approach to predict inverter temperature using standard variables from online monitoring dashboards. Five machine‐learning models, such as decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, histogram‐based gradient boosting, and XGBoost, were evaluated; random forest performed best on an independent test set (R 2 = 0.9947, RMSE = 0.601°C, MAE = 0.471°C). SHAP analysis further provided interpretability and revealed a clear inverse relationship between reactive power and inverter temperature, alongside the effects of the daily cycle and power output. Overall, subdegree (< 1°C) accuracy was achieved with only seven input features, enabling a practical, cost‐effective solution for predictive maintenance and real‐time monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e4efab5b468c4417681https://doi.org/10.1155/je/7443278
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Machine Learning Based Investigation of Behavioral Modeling of the MPPT based Solar PV System Behaviors Evaluation2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of the thermal performance of vapor chambers integrated skived fin heat sink for PV-inverter cooling under multi-heat source condition2025 · 3 citations
  3. 3Investigation of the Temperature Sensitivity of 20-Years Old Field-Aged Photovoltaic Panels Affected by Potential Induced Degradation2022 · 18 citations
  4. 4Random forests with parametric entropy-based information gains for classification and regression problems2024 · 69 citations
  5. 5Advancements in photovoltaic technology: A comprehensive review of recent advances and future prospects2025 · 87 citations