PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Animal Production Science0 citations

Diet quality affects water and feed utilisation in beef heifers drinking high-sulfate water

View Full Paper
DRDiego M. RoldánALAgustín LópezOHOlegario Hernández

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate how diet quality interacts with water quality on feed and water intake, digestibility, and nitrogen metabolism in beef heifers.
  • Eight Braford-crossbred heifers were used in an eight-treatment crossover design.
  • Two types of water quality (low-sulfate and high-sulfate) were combined with four levels of diet quality (low to high).
  • Measurements included water intake, digestible organic matter intake, and ruminal hydrogen sulfide production.
  • A significant interaction was found between diet quality and water quality for water intake (P = 0.04) and organic matter intake (P = 0.01).
  • High-sulfate water reduced water intake and digestible organic matter intake significantly (P < 0.01).
  • Ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations increased with high-sulfate water (P < 0.01).

Abstract

Context Consumption of water with high sulfate concentrations can negatively affect on feed intake in beef cattle. However, limited information is available on how water quality interacts with diets differing in digestibility. Aim This study evaluated the interaction between a broad range of diet quality (DQ) and water quality (WQ) on feed and water intake (WI), total tract digestibility, nitrogen (N) metabolism, and ruminal hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production in beef heifers. Method Eight Braford-crossbred heifers (326 ± 34 kg BW) were used in an eight-treatment crossover design combining two types of WQ, namely, low-sulfate water (LSW; 333 mg/L sulfate, SO4) and high-sulfate water (HSW; 3286 mg/L, SO4) with four DQ of low (LQ), medium–low (MLQ), medium–high (MHQ), and high (HQ). Key results A significant DQ × WQ interaction was observed for WI (P = 0.04), digestible organic matter (OM) intake (DOMI; P = 0.01), and digestible neutral detergent fiber (NDF) intake (DNDFI; P 0.01). Diet quality had a quadratic effect on both water (P = 0.02) and feed intake (P 0.01), with the highest values occurring at intermediate levels of digestibility. High-sulfate water reduced WI (P 0.01), OM intake (OMI; P 0.01), and NDF intake (NDFI; P 0.01). In heifers consuming HSW, DOMI tended to be lower at the highest DQ (HQ; P = 0.07), with lower values also observed at intermediate DQ levels (MLQ and MHQ; P 0.01). Water quality improved and tended to enhance total tract NDF (P = 0.03) and OM digestibility (P = 0.06) respectively. High-sulfate water also increased ruminal H2S concentrations (P 0.01). Conclusions The results of this study demonstrated an interaction between diet and water quality affecting feed intake in beef heifers. Implications Improving diet quality may help mitigate the negative effects of high sulfate-containing water on feed intake. Additionally, incorporating highly digestible NDF into the diet appears to be a viable strategy to maintain ruminal H2S concentrations below toxic thresholds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roldán et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ee7fab5b468c4418329https://doi.org/10.1071/an25460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of sodium sulfate concentration in drinking water for beef heifers, and the in vitro effect of bismuth subsalicylate on H<sub>2</sub>S production and fiber disappearance2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Total dissolved solids in water high in naturally occurring sulfates impacts serum and liver copper and selenium concentrations but does not affect the growth of beef heifers2026
  3. 3Impacts of increasing levels of salt on intake, digestion, and rumen fermentation with beef cattle consuming low-quality forages2024
  4. 418 Impacts of supplementing sulfate vs. hydroxychloride sources of Cu, Mn, and Zn on heifer growth performance and physiology during feed restriction and high-starch challenge periods2024
  5. 565. Does the Source of Trace Mineral Supplementation Influence Fiber Degradability in Beef Cattle?2026