PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Quality of life analysis from a multicenter, randomized, phase 2, investigator-initiated ETCTN trial of olaparib + radium-223 versus radium-223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases (COMRADE).

View Full Paper
RMRana R. McKayWXW. XieAAArchana Ajmera

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the quality of life outcomes from a trial assessing olaparib plus radium-223 versus radium-223 alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either olaparib plus radium-223 (Arm A) or radium-223 alone (Arm B).
  • Quality of life was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline and every 12 weeks.
  • Mixed-effects ANCOVA models assessed treatment effects on quality of life changes accounting for various factors.
  • Of 114 patients, 74 (65%) were evaluable for quality of life analysis with no significant differences in FACT-P total scores between arms at week 12 and week 24.
  • Arm B displayed greater improvement in BPI pain interference at week 12, but this difference was not sustained at week 24.
  • Overall, the combination of olaparib and radium-223 did not show significant detriment to quality of life or pain severity compared to radium-223 alone.

Abstract

5040 Background: Radium-223 is an α-emitting radioisotope that improves overall survival in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases (BM). In the ALSYMPCA trial, radium-223 was also associated with improved quality of life (QOL), delayed time to first opioid use, and pain palliation. We previously reported superior radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) with the addition of olaparib to radium-223 in the randomized phase 2 COMRADE study (NCT03317391). We now report patient-reported QOL outcomes from the trial. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to olaparib 200 mg twice daily plus radium-223 (Arm A) or radium-223 alone (Arm B). QOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline and every 12 weeks. Mixed-effects ANCOVA models assessed treatment effects on QOL changes from baseline, adjusting for baseline score, timepoint, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Least-squares (LS) mean changes were reported for each arm with between-arm differences and 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was limited to patients with baseline and ≥1 post-baseline assessment within 24 weeks. Results: Of 114 treated patients, 74 (65%) were evaluable for QOL analysis (Arm A, n = 40; Arm B, n = 34), including 71 (62%) for FACT-P and 72 (63%) for BPI pain severity and pain interference. Baseline characteristics were well balanced: median age was 70 and 72 years, ECOG PS 1 was present in 60% and 62%, prior docetaxel was received by 55% and 50%, > 20 bone metastases were present in 45% and 47%, and pain medication use at baseline was reported in 60% and 72% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively. There were no significant differences in LS mean change from baseline in FACT-P total score between arms at week 12 (Arm A: -5.09 vs Arm B: -0.23; difference -4.87, 95% CI -13.4 to 3.62) or week 24 (Arm A: -1.41 vs Arm B: -3.20; difference 1.79, 95% CI -8.28 to 11.9). Similarly, no significant between-arm differences were observed in LS mean changes in BPI pain severity at week 12 (difference 0.44, 95% CI -0.44 to 1.33) or week 24 (difference -0.20, 95% CI -1.32 to 0.93). Arm B showed greater improvement in BPI pain interference at week 12 (LS mean change: Arm A +0.21 vs Arm B -0.88; difference 1.09, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.05), but this difference was not sustained at week 24 (difference -0.27, 95% CI -1.37 to 0.82). Conclusions: In this phase 2 trial, the addition of olaparib to radium-223 achieved superior rPFS without significant detriment to patient-reported QOL or pain compared to radium-223 alone, supporting the tolerability of this combination in mCRPC patients with BM. Clinical trial information: NCT03317391 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McKay et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c4418818https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patient‐reported outcomes in castration‐resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases treated with radium‐223 with or without olaparib2026
  2. 2Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Trial of Olaparib Plus Radium-223 Versus Radium-223 in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases (COMRADE)2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics in bone-dominant metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 with or without olaparib: Biomarker analyses from the multicenter, randomized, phase 2, investigator-initiated COMRADE trial.2026
  4. 4UK real-world data of radium-223 dichloride in metastatic prostate cancer2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Comparing patient profiles and treatment outcomes with radium-223 (223Ra) in real-world settings: Academic vs. community practice in the US—Insights from the REASSURE study.2024