Conceptual Distinctions, Design Logics, and Practical Comparisons between University Social Responsibility Courses and Social Practice Courses in Taiwanese Higher Education
This article examines differences in curriculum and purpose between USR and social practice courses in Taiwanese higher education, suggesting they can mutually enhance each other.
Key Points
The aim is to analyze the differences between University Social Responsibility courses and social practice courses in Taiwanese higher education.
Comparative analysis of curriculum and educational purposes of USR and social practice courses.
Examination of how each course type addresses local needs and educational outcomes.
USR courses focus on institutional responses to public needs and policy tasks, showing stronger institutional characteristics.
Social practice courses emphasize student engagement and ethical development through real-world activities, highlighting educational depth.
Mutual reinforcement between USR and social practice courses can enhance social engagement and learning quality.