PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Does a statin a day keep prostate cancer (PC) away?: Statin use and disease progression in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in SEARCH.

View Full Paper
MMMaria P. MogollonJJJessica JanesZKZachary Klaassen

Key Result

Time-dependent statin use during androgen deprivation therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.40-0.64; P<0.001) and disease progression.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the association between statin use and prostate cancer outcomes in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 9,931 prostate cancer patients treated from 1988 to 2020 at 9 VA hospitals.
  • Patients receiving ADT for biochemical recurrence after 2000 were included and analyzed based on statin use at the time of ADT and as a time-dependent covariate.
  • Cox models assessed the relationship between statin use and outcomes like time to metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality.
  • Statin use at ADT showed no significant association with time to metastasis or PCSM (HRs 0.89-0.98, all p>0.2).
  • Time-dependent analysis indicated lower risk of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC, p=0.019) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM, p=0.020) for statin users.
  • Trend towards reduced metastasis was observed (p=0.058) with time-dependent statin use.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,274)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does statin use reduce disease progression and mortality in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy?

P
Population
1,274 patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) at 9 VA hospitals.
I
Intervention
Statin use (evaluated as baseline use at ADT initiation and as a time-dependent covariate)
C
Comparator
No statin use
O
Outcome
Time to metastasis, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM)hard clinical

When accounting for time-dependent initiation, statin use during androgen deprivation therapy is associated with significantly lower rates of castration-resistant prostate cancer and mortality.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.40, 0.64)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

5091 Background: Prior studies suggest statin use may improve PC outcomes, including PC specific mortality (PCSM) and disease progression in patients receiving ADT. However, prior studies compared patients taking vs not taking statins at the time of ADT, ignoring that many statin non-users initiate statins later on. We evaluated the association between statin use and PC outcomes using both baseline (yes/no) and time-dependent exposure definitions in patients initiating ADT after RP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,931 patients with PC treated with RP between 1988 and 2020 at 9 VA hospitals from SEARCH Database. Patients who received ADT for biochemical recurrence after 2000 were included. Those with known metastasis prior to ADT or missing covariates of interest were excluded. Characteristics at ADT were stratified by statin use at time of ADT and compared with rank-sum for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical. Univariable and multivariable Cox models tested associations between statin use at ADT and time to metastasis, castration-resistant PC (CRPC), PCSM and all-cause mortality (ACM), adjusted for clinicopathological variables. As ~50% of non-statin users initiated statins after ADT, additional models treated statin use as time-dependent covariate. Results: Among 1,274 patients treated with ADT, 784 (62%) used statins at time of ADT. Users were older (median 67 vs 65), initiated ADT in more recent years (median 2013 vs 2010), had longer time from RP to ADT (median 39 vs 21 months), and had higher obesity rates (38% vs 25%). PC characteristics were similar between groups, except users had lower rates of positive nodes (11% vs 17%) and seminal vesicle invasion (28% vs 33%). Statin use at ADT was not significantly associated with time to metastasis, CRPC, PCSM or ACM, though HRs indicated lower risk for statin users (all HRs 0.89-0.98, all p>0.2; see table). On time-dependent multivariable analysis, statin use was significantly associated with lower risk of CRPC (p=0.019), PCSM (p=0.020) and ACM (p<0.001). Similar results were seen for metastases, though this did not reach significance (p=0.058) (see table). Conclusions: Statin use at ADT was not associated with PC outcomes after RP. However, accounting for statin initiation during ADT, statin use was associated with notably lower rates of CRPC, PCSM and ACM, with a trend towards reduced metastasis. These findings support the potential role of statins in slowing PC progression and highlight the need for prospective randomized trials of statins in patients initiating ADT. Outcome Statin at ADT, HR (95% CI) p Time-varying statin, HR (95% CI) p Metastasis 0.92 (0.71, 1.20) 0.541 0.74 (0.55, 1.01) 0.058 CRPC 0.95 (0.73, 1.24) 0.702 0.69 (0.51, 0.94) 0.019 PCSM 0.98 (0.70, 1.39) 0.920 0.62 (0.42, 0.93) 0.020 ACM 0.89 (0.73, 1.08) 0.229 0.51 (0.40, 0.64) <0.001

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mogollon et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy (n=1,274). Statin use vs. No statin use was evaluated on All-cause mortality (time-varying statin use) (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40, 0.64, p=<0.001). Time-dependent statin use during androgen deprivation therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.40-0.64; P<0.001) and disease progression.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f88fab5b468c4418b2fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5091
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper