PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology0 citationsOpen Access

Skeletal Age Evaluation with BAUSportTM Ultrasound in Young Slovak Female Athletes and Non-Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study

View Full Paper
PŠPetra ŠvábováICIveta CihováMSMichal Soták

Key Points

  • To evaluate skeletal age using BAUSport™ in Slovak female athletes and non-athletes and examine differences related to biological maturity.
  • Eighty girls aged 6.85–14.41 years underwent skeletal age assessment with BAUSport™.
  • Skeletal maturity was categorized using a ±1.0-year threshold of skeletal age minus chronological age (SA–CA).
  • Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and Welch’s t-test for differences among groups.
  • Volleyball players were significantly older (12.90 ± 0.95 years) than non-athletes (10.22 ± 2.40 years) and track-and-field athletes (8.47 ± 1.51 years).
  • Volleyball players had the largest mean SA–CA difference (+1.98 ± 0.73 years).
  • Maturity category distributions differed significantly across the groups (χ2(4) = 14.32, p = 0.006).

Abstract

Background: Biological maturity assessment is increasingly discussed in youth sport because chronological age alone does not reflect inter-individual variation in growth and pubertal timing. Ultrasound-based systems such as BAUSport™ provide a radiation-free alternative to radiographic skeletal age assessment. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined skeletal age (SA) in Slovak female volleyball players, track-and-field athletes, and non-athletes using BAUSport™, while acknowledging substantial age differences between groups. Methods: Eighty girls (55 non-athletes, 13 volleyball players, 12 track-and-field athletes; aged 6.85–14.41 years) underwent anthropometric measurement and skeletal age (SA) assessment with BAUSport™. Chronological age (CA) was calculated as decimal age from birth date to measurement date. Groups were not age-matched; volleyball players were on average markedly older than the other groups. Skeletal maturity was categorized as early, on-time, or late using a ±1.0-year SA–CA threshold. Menarche status was recorded as an indicator of pubertal development. Group differences were evaluated using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate, while differences in SA and SA–CA according to menarche status were assessed using Welch’s t-test. Results: Volleyball players were older (12.90 ± 0.95 years) than non-athletes (10.22 ± 2.40 years) and track-and-field athletes (8.47 ± 1.51 years). They also demonstrated the largest mean SA–CA difference (+1.98 ± 0.73 years). The distribution of maturity categories differed across groups (χ2(4) = 14.32, p = 0.006, Cramer’s V = 0.30). Post-menarcheal girls exhibited significantly higher skeletal age and SA–CA values compared to pre-menarcheal girls. However, the substantial age disparity between groups represents a primary confounding factor and limits interpretation of sport-specific effects. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the practical application of BAUSport™ for rapid, radiation-free skeletal age assessment in youth. Differences according to menarche status support the biological relevance of skeletal maturity assessment. However, no valid between-group sport-specific inferences can be made because the groups were not age-matched and puberty is the dominant driver of skeletal maturation. Larger, age-matched studies are required before drawing conclusions regarding sport-specific selection patterns.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Švábová et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0525783ba022b6fc22dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ultrasound-derived skeletal maturity estimates of boys and girls selected to football and athletics development programmes: an exploratory study of 716 South African and German adolescents2026
  2. 2Assessment of Biological Age With Conventional Ultrasound Imaging as an Alternative to X‐Ray—A Pilot Study in Youth Soccer2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Assessing the influence of chronological and skeletal age on selection and physical performance in South African youth football2026
  4. 4Ultrasound Imaging-Based Methods for Assessing Biological Maturity during Adolescence and Possible Application in Youth Sport: A Scoping Review2022 · 14 citations
  5. 5Associations Between Bone Age, Body Composition and Physical Performance in Icelandic 12‐Year‐Old Female Soccer Players2025 · 3 citations