(In,Ga)As/(In,Al)As superlattices (SLs) grown on InP(111)B are among the most challenging systems to realize by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), particularly under low-temperature (LT) conditions. To investigate the impact of the low substrate temperature Ts, 50 periods of (In,Ga)As/(In,Al)As were grown on 2° misoriented InP(111)B substrates. Ts was decreased stepwise every 10 SL periods, from 450 to 250 °C, while all other growth parameters were kept constant. The microstructure was investigated using (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. While growth at Ts = 450 °C results in regular and well-defined SL periods, a dramatic degradation of the microstructure is observed as Ts decreases. The first significant change appears upon lowering Ts from 450 to 400 °C, and the resulting periods display a high density of in-plane microtwins and stacking faults. A further reduction in Ts promotes the formation of increasingly defective layers, which in turn give rise to hillocks, cone-like defects, pores, and localized amorphous regions. As discussed here, the observed microstructure is consistent with the breakdown of epitaxy associated with LT-MBE. We show that the distinctive morphology of (In,Ga)As/(In,Al)As SLs and its dependence on Ts can be explained in terms of the critical role of the step-flow growth mode and the influence of Ehrlich–Schwoebel barriers at the step edges. Specifically, the observed microstructure arises from kinetic roughening caused by the progressive inability to sustain step-flow growth as Ts decreases. Given the critical role of surface kinetics, we propose several strategies to improve the overall structural quality.
Luna et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: