PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced efficacy of oral hygiene instructions during motivational interviewing using intraoral scanner technology: a randomized clinical trial.

View Full Paper
JLJacopo LanzettiFFFederica FerratiACArmando Crupi

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoral scanner technology during motivational interviewing for improving oral hygiene.
  • Randomized controlled clinical trial with 80 patients diagnosed with periodontitis Stage I-II.
  • Assessment of Full Mouth Plaque Score and Full Mouth Bleeding Score pre- and post-intervention.
  • Comparison of patient adherence and responses to questionnaires.
  • Mean FMPS change was 16.65 in the test group versus 6.98 in the control group (p = 0.045).
  • Adherence rates showed a significant difference, with 92.5% in the test group versus 57.5% in the control group (p < 0.001).
  • Time for motivational interviewing was longer in the test group (24.02 min) compared to control (22.52 min, p < 0.001).

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the efficacy of an intra-oral scanner (IOS) as adjunctive tool to perform oral hygiene instructions during motivational interviewing (MI). Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was performed in patients diagnosed with periodontitis Stage I-II, Gade A-B. Full Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) (primary outcome) and Full Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) were recorded ad baseline (T0). Consequently, test group was scanned with an IOS, a digital 3D model created and was used during MI including oral hygiene instructions (OHI), while control patients received MI only. After ≥ 66 days (mean: 72 days) (T1), FMPS and FMBS as well as patients’ level of adherence and concordance by means of dedicated questionnaires were assessed and compared to T0. Results A total of 80 patients (mean age 58.2 ± 15.2; 47 female; 62 non-smokers; 18 light smokers) were randomized and available for analysis. Mean FMPS change was 16.65 ± 22.95 for the test group and 6.98 ± 19.41 for the control group (p = 0.045), while FMBS change was 6.77 ± 7.30 for the test group and was 4.64 ± 12.87 for the control group (p = 0.366). Time for MI was 24.02 ± 1.60 min (Test group) and 22.52 ± 1.79 (Control group) (p < 0.001). Patients’ adherence, recorded as interdental care, showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the test group (test group: “yes”=37 (92.5%); “no”=3 (7.5%); control group: “yes”=23 (57.5%); “no”=17 (42.5%) (p < 0.001)). Conclusion Within the limits of this RCT, the implementation of IOS to generate digital three-dimensional models of patients’ dentition demonstrated potential for improving the effectiveness of OHI during a single-session MI in terms of FMPS reduction. Clinical significance The incorporation of intraoral scanning technology may represent a beneficial visual adjunct that strengthens patient-clinician communication and could contribute to enhanced self-performed oral hygiene, improved plaque control, and increase patient adherence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lanzetti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd1b05783ba022b6fd2dchttps://doi.org/10.48620/97996
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper