PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) Following its First Application: A Bibliometric Analysis

LCLorenzo Coronella

Key Points

  • This paper aims to analyze scientific production on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
  • Conducted bibliometric analysis on a sample of 117 papers on CSRD
  • Used co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and keyword analysis
  • Performed cluster analysis of keywords to identify key research themes
  • Identified significant focus on themes such as sustainability, regulation, and stakeholders
  • Revealed key implications for scholars and companies regarding CSRD research
  • Provided insights into the evolution and characteristics of literature on the CSRD

Abstract

The transition from the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) stimulated research on the implications of this sustainability reform. The discussion began far before the first application of the directive and spanned transversal sectors (e.g., management, accounting, economics, and finance). Studies on this topic aimed to explore both the requirements and the implications of the CSRD. Given this picture, the aim of this paper is to analyze the scientific production on the CSRD relying on a bibliometric analysis of the literature from the first paper published on this topic to date. To do so, I employed a bibliometric analysis on a sample of 117 papers addressing the CSRD, analysing them through co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and keyword analysis. The cluster analysis of the keywords revealed a great attention to severe themes (i.e., sustainability, stakeholders, climate change, regulation, management perspectives, sustainable development, corporate sustainability, sustainability reporting, biodiversity, indicators, and performance). Following the analysis and discussion, this paper highlights the key features of studies on CSRD and provides insights and implications for both scholars and companies. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first comprehensive work on a systematic analysis of the literature on the CSRD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lorenzo Coronella (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd1db5783ba022b6fd4f8https://doi.org/10.61013/2724-4466/6.2.77-108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Are firms (getting) ready for the corporate sustainability reporting directive?2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Beyond Financials: Understanding the Implications of NFRD and CSRD on Non-financial Reporting2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3The preparedness of “first wave” companies to the European corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD)2026
  4. 4Corporate Sustainability Reporting – Between Politics and Reality2025
  5. 5Unveiling the effects of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on company sustainability reporting practices: a case of German companies2025 · 16 citations