PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism0 citationsOpen Access

Wilderness Overflight Soundscape Index (OSI): Mapping, measuring and describing overflight soundscape impacts at nested scales

View Full Paper
DHDaniel S. HackettVAVanessa M. AdamsJKJamie B. Kirkpatrick

Key Points

  • To assess and map the experiential impacts of aircraft overflights on users of wilderness areas.
  • Adapted reserve-scale mensuration method from the U.S.A. for Australian NWI.
  • Utilized decision tree and raster mapping processes to evaluate soundscape impacts.
  • Applied technique to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
  • Overflight soundscape noise impacts were detected in ∼506,814 ha (32%) of the TWWHA.
  • Significant cumulative impacts found in the south-west, while negligible impacts noted in the north.
  • Reveals spatiotemporal patterns allowing for management interventions while maintaining air access.

Abstract

Wilderness is both a conservation and recreational resource. These competing demands and uses can present challenges for managers. In Australia, wilderness areas are measured and mapped with the National Wilderness Inventory (NWI) approach, however, the NWI does not account for the experiential impacts of aircraft overflights on park users. Here, we adapt a reserve-scale mensuration method developed in the U.S.A. for incorporation into the Australian NWI framework. We innovate within our approach by using a decision tree and raster mapping processes to assess soundscape impacts at nested scales of individual pixels, flight path, and reserve-scale. We apply our technique to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA), to first evaluate overflight soundscape impacts at the flight-path scale, then at the overall cumulative reserve-scale. The results indicate overflight soundscape noise impacts to ∼506,814 ha (32%) of the TWWHA. Cumulative overflight soundscape impacts were detected in the south-west of the reserve, an area comparatively free of complex private or public built infrastructure, other than a public landing strip, adjacent infrastructure node (Melaleuca), and low-volume walking tracks. Conversely, negligible cumulative overflight soundscape impacts were detected in the north of the reserve, where the majority of built public and private tourism infrastructure, use, and major formed tracks are located. These results are counter-intuitive and reveal spatiotemporal patterns that may be modified through management interventions, while maintaining existing air access provisions. While we apply our method to the TWWHA, it is widely relevant to managers who must manage recreation uses, and air access, within protected areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hackett et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd1f65783ba022b6fd55dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2026.101055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation2016 · 1,924 citations
  2. 2Research note: Spatial variations of condition class in Clifty Wilderness, Daniel Boone National Forest, KY, USA2022 · 1 citations
  3. 3Taming the Wilderness Myth1992 · 346 citations
  4. 4An assessment of noise audibility and sound levels in U.S. National Parks2011 · 94 citations
  5. 5Soundscapes and environmental noise management2010 · 91 citations