PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Biomedicines0 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of the Paul Glaucoma Implant in an Ambispective Multicenter Study: 12-Month Follow-Up

View Full Paper
CLCelina LogiocoALAnahi LupinacciILIgnacio Lischinsky

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Paul Glaucoma Implant in an Argentine cohort over 12 months.
  • Ambispective multicenter study including patients from November 2022 to July 2024.
  • Primary outcomes measured were intraocular pressure reduction and success rates post-implantation.
  • Secondary outcomes included medication use, visual acuity, and complications.
  • Mean intraocular pressure decreased from 31.2 mmHg to 12.8 mmHg (p < 0.01).
  • Medications were reduced from 3.5 to 1.3 (p < 0.01).
  • 76.9% achieved complete success, while 25% experienced postoperative complications.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Paul Glaucoma Implant (PGI) in a multicenter Argentine cohort with 12 months of follow-up. Methods: This ambispective multicenter study included patients who underwent PGI implantation between November 2022 and July 2024 by glaucoma specialists across Argentina, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Primary outcomes were intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and success rates, defined as complete success (≥20% IOP reduction with IOP ≥6 and ≤21 mmHg without medications), qualified success (same criteria with ≥1 medication), and failure based on predefined efficacy and safety criteria, including additional glaucoma surgery, device removal, or clinically significant hypotony. Secondary outcomes included changes in medication use, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and postoperative complications. Results: Sixty-six eyes were included in the overall analysis. Mean IOP decreased from 31.2 ± 9.1 mmHg preoperatively to 12.8 ± 4.7 mmHg at 12 months (p < 0.01). Medications were reduced from 3.5 ± 0.8 to 1.3 ± 1.2 (p < 0.01). Among the 65 eyes with evaluable 12-month follow-up, 50 eyes (76.9%) achieved complete success, 14 (21.5%) qualified success, and 1 (1.5%) failure. Complications were ocular hypertension (25%), tube or plate exposure (10%), choroidal detachment (7%), and hypotony (5%). BCVA remained stable in 28 eyes (43.8%), improved in 15 (23.4%), and worsened in 21 (32.8%). Conclusions: The PGI achieved significant and sustained IOP reduction with marked medication decrease at 12 months. Most complications were mild or moderate. These findings support the PGI as an effective and safe non-valved implant for refractory glaucoma in Latin American populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Logioco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2375783ba022b6fda4bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14061230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Three-Year Outcomes of the Paul Glaucoma Implant for Treatment of Glaucoma2024 · 32 citations
  2. 2The Paul Glaucoma Implant: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, and emerging applications2025 · 17 citations
  3. 3A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in the management of neovascular glaucoma: absence of consensus and variability in practice2022 · 26 citations
  4. 4Treatment Outcomes Using the PAUL Glaucoma Implant to Control Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Refractory Glaucoma2020 · 79 citations
  5. 5Reporting Harm in Glaucoma Surgical Trials: Systematic Review and a Consensus-Derived New Classification System2018 · 31 citations