PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Satellite-derived precipitation data calibration using ground-based rain gauge observations by means of machine learning methods

NBNavid BagherpourMSMohammad Reza Saradjian

Key Points

  • This study aims to enhance the accuracy of precipitation estimates by combining satellite data with ground observations using machine learning methods.
  • Integrated monthly precipitation records from 190 stations (2000–2024) with satellite precipitation products and environmental predictors.
  • Implemented Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models to correct satellite biases.
  • Evaluated model performance based on estimation errors and correlation coefficients.
  • XGBoost reduced mean RMSE by approximately 20–30 mm, while correlation coefficients improved from 0.4–0.5 to 0.6.
  • Feature importance analysis identified GPM, CHIRPS, and elevation as the most influential predictors.
  • XGBoost outperformed MLP, particularly in diverse environmental conditions.

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate precipitation estimation is vital for water resource management, climate monitoring, and natural hazard assessment. However, satellite precipitation products (SPPs) such as CHIRPS and GPM often exhibit significant biases, particularly over complex mountainous regions. This study aims to improve precipitation estimates across Mazandaran Province, northern Iran, by integrating satellite data with rain gauge observations through machine learning (ML) approaches. Monthly precipitation records from 190 stations (2000–2024) were combined with SPPs and environmental predictors, including elevation, soil moisture, temperature, and land cover. Two ML models—Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)—were implemented to correct satellite biases and enhance spatial precipitation accuracy. Both models substantially reduced estimation errors relative to raw satellite data, with XGBoost achieving superior performance. The mean RMSE decreased by approximately 20–30 mm, and correlation coefficients increased from about 0.4–0.5 to 0.6. Feature importance analysis indicated that GPM, CHIRPS, and elevation were the most influential predictors. Stratified evaluation by elevation, rainfall intensity, and forest cover revealed that XGBoost maintained robust performance under diverse environmental conditions, while MLP was more sensitive to topographic variability. Overall, the integration of multi-source data and ML-based bias correction demonstrates strong potential for improving precipitation accuracy in regions with complex topography and sparse gauge coverage, supporting more reliable hydrological and climate applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bagherpour et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2515783ba022b6fdb8dhttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w8-2025-141-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper