PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Environmental Science & Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Ecotoxicology in the Context of Biodiversity Loss: Lessons from Seven Decades of Chemical Impacts and Paths Forward

View Full Paper
JSJohn P. SumpterLMLuigi Margiotta‐Casaluci

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the impact of chemical pollution on biodiversity and how ecotoxicology can improve environmental protections.
  • Analyzed case studies from the last 70 years, including various chemicals and their effects on wildlife.
  • Evaluated current ecotoxicological testing and regulatory practices.
  • Proposed new principles for enhancing chemical safety and biodiversity protection.
  • Highlighted weaknesses in current regulatory responses, showing reliance on reactive measures.
  • Identified unpredicted sensitivities and overlooked pathways that complicate testing.
  • Recommended a shift towards predictive, data-driven approaches to better assess and mitigate ecological harm.

Abstract

Chemical pollution is a major anthropogenic driver of biodiversity loss, yet its relative contribution compared to other stressors remains difficult to quantify. Ecotoxicology emerged as a discipline in response to evidence that chemicals in the environment can harm wildlife, but anticipating and preventing ecological damage remains challenging. This Review examines how ecotoxicology research has informed environmental protection, drawing on case studies spanning over 70 years, including pesticides and birds, tributyltin and mollusks, diclofenac and vultures, and 6PPD-quinone and salmon. These examples highlight recurring challenges─such as unpredicted species-specific sensitivities, unanticipated exposure pathways, and modes of action overlooked by standard testing frameworks─that have typically resulted in reactive rather than preventive regulatory responses. In light of the thousands of chemicals in use and widespread environmental mixtures, the Review evaluates strengths and limitations of current ecotoxicological testing and regulatory practices. It proposes pragmatic principles for enhanced protection, emphasizing prevention, prioritization under uncertainty, improved predictive capacity, and cross-sector collaboration, while acknowledging inevitable trade-offs between environmental safeguards and essential societal uses of chemicals. The Review argues that ecotoxicology must evolve rapidly by embracing predictive non-animal and data-driven approaches to more effectively reduce the risk of severe, widespread, or irreversible ecological harm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sumpter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2845783ba022b6fdf15https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c00982
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper