PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Terminal Moving-Face and Boundary-Normal Reduction for the Rational Hodge Conjecture: The TEBAC Hodge Program V

View Full Paper
TKTosho Lazarov Karadzhov

Key Points

  • The manuscript aims to provide a terminal reduction framework for the rational Hodge conjecture by clarifying geometric conditions and constructions.
  • Introduced terminal module HODGE-V addressing the relationship between Hodge classes and algebraic cycles.
  • Converted remaining problems into a dual detector framework seeking non-trivial constructions.
  • Developed chains of conditions through various geometric and algebraic criteria to minimize assumptions used in proving the conjecture.
  • Present explicit remaining geometric targets for proving the rational Hodge conjecture through terminal reductions.
  • Achieved high internal progress markers indicating substantial advancement in approaching the conjecture.
  • Established compatibility conditions between various geometric constructions to refine existing proofs.

Abstract

This manuscript presents the current terminal module \ (HODGE-V\) of the TEBAC Hodge program toward the rational Hodge conjecture. For a smooth projective complex variety \ (X/C\) and codimension \ (p\), the target is the equality \ (KXᵖ = Aᵖ (X) \), where \ (KXᵖ = H^2p (X, Q) H^p, p (X) \) is the rational Hodge carrier and \ (Aᵖ (X) = spanₐ\Z: Z X algebraic of codimension p\\) is the rational subspace generated by algebraic cycle classes. The manuscript works with the terminal quotient \ (VXᵖ = KXᵖ/UXᵖ\), where \ (UXᵖ\) contains the already certified Lefschetz, direct Chow, incidence, total-space, specialization, and previously verified moving-locus contributions. The remaining problem is converted into a dual detector problem: \ (0 (VXᵖ) ^ \, such that () 0\), where \ (\) must be produced by an admissible Hilbert--Chow, boundary-normal, moving-face, or corrected source construction, not inserted by assuming the Hodge conjecture. The main unconditional output of the manuscript is a non-circular terminal reduction of the rational Hodge conjecture to explicit remaining geometric targets. The current version develops the chain \ (U1 U2 U3\) through detector-selected semistable packets, raw-source production, coherent raw-source modules, packet exhaustivity, corrected detector projection, and U1--U3 compatibility. The latest passes introduce several finite certificate normal forms. The U1 image-separation problem is reduced to a boundary-response cone and projective base-locus condition \ (V_^resp = VXᵖ\), \ (Qₗ, ₏^U1 = 0\), and \ (Bₗ, ₏^U1 = \), and further to a finite determinant certificate \ (ₗ, ₏^U1 0\). The U3 corrected detector survival problem is reduced to a finite correction-kernel and rank-jump condition \ (L, ^det RowSpan\! (C, ^corr) \). The R3 packet-exhaustivity gate is reduced to the quotient-defect condition \ (Q, ^R3: = S, ^raw/im\! (R, ^raw) = 0\). The R1 boundedness gate is reduced to a finite local ledger certificate \ (, ^R1 = 0\), and the R2 coherence gate is expressed through finite-presentation, kernel, and overlap-cocycle criteria. This version also adds the U1--U3 compatibility bridge. It introduces the corrected response cone \ (V_^corr-resp: = spanₐ\R, ^{V (u): u K, ^corr\} VXᵖ\) and the compatibility defect \ (Qₗ, ₏^U1/U3: = VXᵖ/V_^corr-resp\). Thus the remaining terminal problem is sharpened to proving corrected detector-visible spanning after all boundary, obstruction, residue, and admissibility corrections have been imposed. The manuscript does not use the Hodge conjecture, the generalized Hodge conjecture, the standard conjectures, Bloch--Beilinson/Murre filtrations, motivic full faithfulness, or the assertion that every rational \ ( (p, p) \) -class is algebraic as inputs. Its current status is best described as an advanced terminal reduction manuscript with explicit remaining hard geometric targets, rather than a completed unconditional proof of the rational Hodge conjecture. Internal working indicators in this version are as follows: Reduction architecture: \ (99. 997\%\) ; Full unconditional proof: \ (95. 90\%\) ; Annals-facing reduction manuscript: \ (99. 58\%\) ; Annals-facing full-proof manuscript: \ (92. 35\%\). These percentages are internal progress markers for the TEBAC development and should not be interpreted as external certification of the Millennium problem.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd2ab5783ba022b6fe280https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20451957
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper