PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Acta cardiologica. Supplementum1 citations

Differential prognostic value of echocardiography and strain in HFrEF vs HFpEF at early post-acute reassessment

View Full Paper
JSJuan M. Salvador-CasabónILIsaac LacambraDGDaniel Grados-Saso

Key Result

Early post-discharge changes in global longitudinal strain in HFrEF (c-statistic 0.79) and right atrial area in HFpEF (c-statistic 0.75) independently predicted heart failure readmission or death.

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the prognostic value of echocardiography and strain in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) during early post-acute reassessment.
  • Performed echocardiography and strain assessments in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.
  • Utilized follow-up data to measure outcomes and prognostic implications.
  • Employed statistical analyses to compare findings between the two heart failure types.
  • Echocardiography showed superior prognostic value in HFrEF patients compared to HFpEF.
  • Strain analyses indicated similar trends, suggesting potential clinical applications.
  • Early post-acute reassessment revealed significant differences in outcomes based on heart failure types.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=110)

Structured PICO

Does early post-discharge echocardiography and strain assessment predict outcomes differently in HFrEF versus HFpEF patients?

P
Population
110 patients (mean age 74.6, 37% female) hospitalized for acute heart failure (69 HFrEF, 41 HFpEF) who completed baseline and one-month reassessments, followed for 1.9 years.
E
Exposure
Echocardiography and strain assessment (including global longitudinal strain [GLS], right ventricular free wall strain [RVFW-LS], and TAPSE/sPAP) at baseline and one-month post-discharge.
O
Outcome
Composite of HF readmission and cardiovascular death (MACE)composite

Early post-discharge echocardiographic reassessment provides differential prognostic value based on LVEF phenotype, with strain recovery protecting in HFrEF and right-heart remodelling dominating risk in HFpEF.

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the prognostic value of echocardiographic and strain parameters, their early dynamics after acute HF hospitalisation, and potential differences in post-acute evolution between HFrEF (LVEF -16.3), and biomarkers predicted adverse outcomes. In HFrEF, favourable LV geometry, better GLS (2) and ΔRVFW-LS (>1.8) were protective. In HFpEF, impaired GLS (>-16.6), RV dysfunction, and adverse right-sided remodelling predicted worse prognosis. In multivariable Cox analysis, ΔGLS, de novo HF, and NT-proBNP remained independent predictors in HFrEF (c-statistic 0.79). In HFpEF, ΔRA area and ST2 retained prognostic significance (c-statistic 0.75). CONCLUSION: Early post-discharge echocardiography, including biventricular strain, adds prognostic value in post-acute HF. Determinants differ by LVEF phenotype: strain recovery and less rigid LV geometry protect in HFrEF, whereas right-heart dysfunction and remodelling dominate in HFpEF. Short-term imaging reassessment may refine risk stratification and guide follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Salvador-Casabón et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=110). Early post-discharge echocardiography and strain reassessment vs. Admission echocardiography values was evaluated on Composite of HF readmission and cardiovascular death (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Early post-discharge changes in global longitudinal strain in HFrEF (c-statistic 0.79) and right atrial area in HFpEF (c-statistic 0.75) independently predicted heart failure readmission or death.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd56e5783ba022b6fe39fhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2677967
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper