Omental fat thickness measured by ultrasound was significantly higher in males than females (40.5 mm vs 27.3 mm) and consistently correlated with metabolic risk markers in pediatric obesity.
Cross-Sectional (n=84)
No
Does ultrasound-measured omental fat thickness correlate with metabolic risk markers in pediatric patients with overweight or obesity?
Omental fat thickness measured by ultrasound is a sex-specific marker of metabolic risk in pediatric obesity.
Absolute Event Rate: 40.5% vs 27.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
Background Visceral adiposity in pediatric obesity is conventionally assessed through aggregate measures that lack compartmental resolution. The Eco-Obesity ultrasound protocol enables simultaneous quantification of distinct abdominal fat layers. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and metabolic correlates of each compartment in a pediatric cohort with overweight or obesity. Methods Retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive pediatric patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary obesity unit. All underwent structured Eco-Obesity ultrasound, anthropometric assessment, bioelectrical impedance, and fasting biochemical profiling. Pearson correlations between fat layer thickness and cardiometabolic parameters were computed for the overall cohort and stratified by sex. ROC curve analysis was performed to identify optimal omental fat thickness cut-offs for the discrimination of metabolically unhealthy status, defined as the fulfilment of at least one criterion: HDL-cholesterol 40 mg/dL, triglycerides 150 mg/dL, fasting glucose 100 mg/dL, blood pressure above the 90th percentile, HOMA-IR 3.16, or hepatic steatosis. Results The cohort comprised 84 pediatric patients (62% female; mean age 14.0 ± 2.6 years; mean BMI SDS 2.8 ± 1.1), of whom 71.3% were classified as obese (class I–III) and 28.7% as overweight with abdominal obesity; 28.3% presented ultrasound-diagnosed hepatic steatosis. Omental fat was the only compartment consistently associated with anthropometric obesity indices, insulin resistance, LDL cholesterol, and hepatic steatosis, and the only one to exhibit significant sexual dimorphism (40.5 mm males vs. 27.3 mm females; p = 0.001). Associations were markedly stronger in males. ROC analysis to predict metabolic syndrome showed AUCs of 0.64 (males; cut-off 34.6 mm) and 0.57 (females; cut-off 19.6 mm). Conclusion Omental fat appears to be the visceral compartment most consistently associated with metabolic risk markers in pediatric obesity, with sex-specific thresholds substantially lower than adult reference values, reinforcing the need for a dedicated pediatric cut-off.
Sánchez et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Pediatric obesity or overweight with abdominal obesity (n=84). Eco-Obesity ultrasound protocol was evaluated on Omental fat thickness (males vs females) (p=<0.001). Omental fat thickness measured by ultrasound was significantly higher in males than females (40.5 mm vs 27.3 mm) and consistently correlated with metabolic risk markers in pediatric obesity.