PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Sex- and Gender-Specific Biomedicine0 citationsOpen Access

Sex Representation in Clinical Trials in Korea Compared with Global Trends

SYSeonghae Yoon

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate sex representation in Korean Phase 1 clinical trials compared to global trends.
  • Analyzed all clinical trials from 2004 to 2023 using ClinicalTrials.gov API.
  • Categorized trials by phase and sex representation.
  • Examined trends in recruitment patterns and result reporting.
  • Phase 1 trials in Korea showed over 40%-50% male-only enrollment, compared to 10%-15% globally.
  • Female participation rates in Korean Phase 1 trials averaged around 40%, markedly lower than global averages.
  • Healthy volunteer studies accounted for a significant portion of male-only trials in Korea.

Abstract

Objectives: Sex is a critical biological variable influencing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.While global initiatives like the Sex as a Biological Variable policy of the U.S. National Institute of Health which aims to enhance sex inclusivity, Phase 1 trials often exclude women due to safety concerns.This study quantitatively evaluates sex representation in Korean Phase 1 trials compared to global trends.Methods: All clinical trials initiated between 2004 and 2023 were retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov using the public application programming interface.Studies were categorized as Global or Korea and classified by phase (Phase 1-4).We assessed protocol-defined eligibility criteria, pooled female participation rates, and target conditions.Trends in recruitment patterns and discrepancies between initiated and results-posted studies were examined.Findings: In Phases 2-4, trials predominantly enrolled participants of all sexes (>90%) both globally and in Korea, with female participation rates near 50%.In contrast, Phase 1 trials in Korea demonstrated a marked male predominance.While globally maleonly Phase 1 trials remained stable at 10%-15%, they frequently exceeded 40%-50% in Korea.Actual female enrollment in Korean Phase 1 trials was consistently lower and more variable than the global average (~40%).This disparity was largely driven by healthy volunteer studies, which accounted for approximately half of male-only trials in Korea.Although sex data were reliably reported when results were posted, the overall rate of result reporting in Korean Phase 1 trials was low.Conclusions: While Korean clinical trials have achieved quantitative growth and secured sex diversity comparable to global standards in late phase trials (Phases 2-4), a male-centric composition persists in Phase 1 clinical trials.To enhance the generalizability of data across all potential patient populations, continuous institutional improvements and sustained attention are required to encourage the inclusion of diverse demographic groups, starting from early phase studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seonghae Yoon (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d21e502fbce9130637c93https://doi.org/10.65400/sgbm.2026.1.2.136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper