Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 2026Cancer MedicineOpen Access

Bayesian Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Avelumab Plus Axitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WFWataru FukuokayaKMKeiichiro MoriTYTakafumi Yanagisawa

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Bayesian trial analysis shows treatment effect variations in advanced renal cell carcinoma based on risk groups, suggesting nuanced interpretations.

Key Points

  • This study aims to reinterpret the treatment effects of avelumab plus axitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma using Bayesian methods.
  • Reanalyzed individual participant data from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial using Bayesian frameworks.
  • Estimated probabilities of overall survival benefits using Bayesian Cox models.
  • Performed subgroup analyses based on risk groups and PD-L1 status.
  • The probability of overall survival benefit (HR < 1.0) was high (93.0% to 95.5%).
  • However, the probability of exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (HR < 0.75) was low (1.0% to 3.8%).
  • Subgroup analyses revealed probabilities of HR < MCID varied significantly by risk group, from 63.4% for poor-risk to 0.9% for intermediate-risk.

Cite This Study

Fukuokaya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d224302fbce913063816dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71999
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma2019 · 3,490 citations
  2. 2Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Subgroup Analysis2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up from the phase III randomised CheckMate 9ER trial2024 · 99 citations
  4. 4brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan2017 · 9,899 citations
  5. 5Bayesian Analytical Methods in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: Why, When, and How2024 · 23 citations