PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Soil health and economic evaluations of direct seeded rice through metabolomic and biochemical fingerprinting

PKPrabhjit KaurJGJasvir Singh GillMCmukesh chander

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the soil health and economic advantages of direct seeded rice (DSR) technology compared to puddled transplanted rice (PTR).
  • Conducted over three cropping seasons from 2020 to 2022 in Amritsar, Punjab.
  • Measured soil parameters including earthworm count, NPK levels, and enzymatic activity in DSR vs. PTR fields.
  • Analyzed economic metrics including costs and profit margins associated with DSR technology.
  • DSR fields showed a higher average earthworm count (124.6) compared to PTR (68).
  • Improved NPK levels and enzymatic activity were observed in DSR, contributing to better soil health.
  • Yield in DSR improved by 3.44—18.21%, with a net profit increase of 13.91—31.62% over PTR.

Abstract

The present study was conducted for three consecutive cropping seasons from 2020–2022 in Amritsar of Punjab with the objective to analyze the soil health and economic impact of direct seeded rice (DSR) technology over puddled transplanted rice (PTR). It was recorded high number of average earthworm count in the soil sample of DSR fields (Mean value 124.6) as compared to PTR fields (Mean value 68). The soil health was also improved through DSR technique as various physical parameters i.e. porosity, bulk density 9.92) as compared to PTR fields. It was also observed that soil sample of DSR field showed improved carbon composition (HAs, FPA, GRSPs, WSOC, HWSOC, EE) & soil enzymatic activity (DHA, ALK, ACP & PMN) as compared to PTR soil sample. The various reproductive, photosynthetic, and yield parameters of rice crops was observed improved in DSR over the PTR. The HPLC–MS based fingerprinting showed up-regulation of amino acid and phenolics in rice grains grown through DSR technique over the PTR. The cost of field preparation and tillage was reduced by 62.15% in DSR over PTR. The DSR technology resulted into yield improvement by 3.44—18.21% as compared to transplanted rice. A net profit of 13.91—31.62% was calculated in DSR over PTR technique.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaur et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d22f702fbce91306389c9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55509-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper