PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026International Journal of Retina and Vitreous0 citationsOpen Access

Biosimilars of anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases: a narrative review of regulatory, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic aspects

View Full Paper
YZYuan ZongQFQiwei FanLHLijun Huang

Key Points

  • This review aims to consolidate evidence on the regulatory, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic aspects of anti-VEGF biosimilars for retinal diseases.
  • Conducted a narrative review of regulatory documents from FDA, EMA, and NMPA.
  • Analyzed Phase III clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
  • Included studies from 2015 to 2025 that reported on regulatory approval, efficacy, and safety of anti-VEGF biosimilars.
  • Regulatory reviews confirm rigorous biosimilarity assessment with analytical characterization and clinical trials.
  • Pivotal Phase III studies show therapeutic equivalence of biosimilars, maintaining comparable visual acuity and safety.
  • Pharmacoeconomic data indicates a 20-40% cost reduction compared to originators, enhancing patient access.

Abstract

Abstract Background Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are the cornerstone therapy for retinal vascular diseases including neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion. With patent expirations of ranibizumab and aflibercept, biosimilars have emerged as cost-effective alternatives. However, vitreoretinal specialists require consolidated evidence on regulatory standards, clinical equivalence, and practical implementation strategies to guide evidence-based integration of biosimilars into clinical practice. Methods We conducted a narrative review of regulatory documents from the FDA, EMA, and NMPA, as well as Phase III clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacoeconomic analyses of approved ophthalmic anti-VEGF biosimilars. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, and regulatory databases from 2015 to 2025. Studies were included if they reported regulatory approval pathways, clinical efficacy and safety data, interchangeability studies, or pharmacoeconomic evaluations of anti-VEGF biosimilars in retinal diseases. Results Regulatory frameworks demonstrate rigorous biosimilarity assessment through comprehensive analytical characterization, preclinical evaluation, and clinical trials. Pivotal Phase III studies confirm therapeutic equivalence of approved biosimilars (including ranibizumab-nuna and aflibercept-abzv) with comparable visual acuity outcomes, safety profiles, and immunogenicity to originator products. Real-world evidence for ranibizumab biosimilars supports comparable outcomes to originators, while evidence for aflibercept biosimilars remains preliminary and warrants continued pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoeconomic analyses demonstrate 20–40% cost reduction compared to originators, offering substantial healthcare savings and improved patient access. Key implementation considerations include extrapolation principles, switching protocols, and clinic workflow integration. Conclusions Although real-world data for aflibercept biosimilars are currently limited, emerging evidence for ranibizumab biosimilars supports comparable outcomes. Approved anti-VEGF biosimilars represent safe, effective, and cost-saving alternatives for retinal diseases. With robust analytical and clinical evidence supporting biosimilarity, vitreoretinal specialists can confidently adopt these agents. Successful integration requires understanding of regulatory science, evidence-based switching protocols, and healthcare system collaborations to maximize patient benefits while maintaining treatment standards. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, broader implementation studies, and pharmacovigilance monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d234302fbce9130638e49https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00872-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Randomized Trial of Biosimilar ABP 938 Compared with Reference Aflibercept in Adults with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration2025 · 9 citations
  2. 2Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of CT-P42 in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: 52-Week Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Significant reduction in the cost of care for retinal diseases in India due to the approval of biosimilars: Lessons for health systems2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Evidence That Regulatory And Market Forces Are Driving Adoption Of Biosimilars2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5The process defines the product: what really matters in biosimilar design and production?2017 · 179 citations