PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics0 citationsOpen Access

Preoperative dynamic anterior tibial translation is not predictive of graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

View Full Paper
DMDavid MazyNCNicolas CanceLALucia Angelelli

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to determine whether higher preoperative dynamic anterior tibial translation (DATT) using laximetry is a risk factor for graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods This retrospective study included all patients who underwent primary ACLR with hamstring autograft between January 2014 and December 2017. Demographic data, absolute DATT on the injured side and ΔDATT (side‐to‐side difference), posterior tibial slope (PTS), static anterior tibial translation (SATT), concomitant lateral extra‐articular tenodesis (LET) and meniscal tears were collected. Subgroup analysis was performed using a ΔDATT threshold of 6 mm. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for ACL graft rupture. Results Among the 680 patients included with a minimum follow‐up of 6 years, 41 (6%) experienced graft rupture at a mean of 45 ± 30 months postoperatively. The median DATT on the injured side was 9 mm interquartile range, IQR, 5, and the median ΔDATT was 6 mm IQR, 4. Graft rupture occurred in 5.8% for patients with ΔDATT < 6 mm and in 6.3% for patients with ΔDATT ≥ 6 mm ( p = 0.787). Patients with ΔDATT ≥ 6 mm demonstrated a higher prevalence of medial meniscal tears (31% vs. 24%, p = 0.026). Independent risk factors for graft rupture included PTS ≥ 12° (odds ratio OR 3.1; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.6–6.3; p < 0.001) and SATT ≥ 5 mm (OR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2–5.5; p = 0.027), whereas neither ΔDATT nor absolute DATT was significantly associated with graft rupture. Conclusion Preoperative DATT is not predictive of graft rupture following ACLR using hamstring autograft. PTS and SATT remain stronger predictors and should be prioritised for preoperative risk stratification. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective case‐control study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mazy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d8e4a266863fda62f76a3https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70784
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A high level of knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in high revision rates2022 · 23 citations
  2. 2Ligamentous Laxity of the Knee During Childhood and Adolescence2008 · 43 citations
  3. 3The Effect of Medial Versus Lateral Meniscectomy on the Stability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee2010 · 425 citations
  4. 4Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Children and Adolescents2016 · 72 citations
  5. 5How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis1991 · 3,870 citations